These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11822139)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Esthetic composite resin facings for amalgam restorations.
    Lambert RL; Scrabeck JG; Robinson FB
    Gen Dent; 1983; 31(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 6575935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Penetration of amalgam constituents into dentine.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2009 May; 37(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 19231059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Comparative in vivo wear-resistance measurements between amalgam and composite materials. Results after 2 years].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 6931810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - a 10-year report.
    Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R; Gaebler P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15387840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):342-4. PubMed ID: 15195736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Corrosion potential recovery of dental amalgam restorations following prophylaxis.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet JP; Maillet WA; Hall GC; Millar M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):840-3. PubMed ID: 16934322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Mixed amalgam-composite restorations. A new conservative technique].
    Goracci G; Maggiore C; Ferraro E
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Oct; 58(15):54-8, 61-4, 67. PubMed ID: 2279598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
    Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. In vivo galvanic currents of intermittently contacting dental amalgam and other metallic restorations.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):823-31. PubMed ID: 15451237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Posterior composites. State-of-the-art clinical applications.
    Leinfelder KF
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 8348994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The abrasion of composites in the region of the lateral teeth--results after 3 years].
    Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 6997011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using flowable composite as a base for amalgam restorations.
    McArdle BF
    Dent Today; 2002 Mar; 21(3):46-9. PubMed ID: 11915218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Overcoming obstacles to placing posterior direct resin restorations.
    Bertolotti RL
    Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):66-71. PubMed ID: 12524821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.