These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11822149)

  • 1. [Amalgam. VIII. Substitute for amalgam: the biocompatibility of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Sep; 100(9):389-91. PubMed ID: 11822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [General health damage by restorations of composite].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):444-7. PubMed ID: 11921987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Amalgam. X. Glass-ionomer cement: a biocompatible substitute for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Nov; 100(11):484-8. PubMed ID: 11822129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Black or white--is amalgam 'out'? Part 1. Amalgam or composite: which of these 2 materials is the most deleterious?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):128-34. PubMed ID: 19227686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The safe and effective use of dental amalgam.
    Mjör IA
    Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3316042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results.
    Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
    Wahl MJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Pulp response to restorative materials].
    Advokaat JG
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1990 Mar; 97(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 2096304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems.
    Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Curricular issues changing from amalgam to tooth-coloured materials.
    Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):367-9. PubMed ID: 15193784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.