These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11822262)

  • 1. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice.
    Higgins J; Thompson S; Deeks J; Altman D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Jan; 7(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 11822262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Moher D; Boon H; Beyene J; Bombardier C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jul; 12():111. PubMed ID: 22846171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogeneity of studies in anesthesiology systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological review and proposal for evidence mapping.
    Umberham B; Hedin R; Detweiler B; Kollmorgen L; Hicks C; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 119(5):874-884. PubMed ID: 29029012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting 'number needed to treat' in meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study.
    Naing C; Aung K; Mak JW
    J Evid Based Med; 2012 Nov; 5(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 23557504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
    Afshari A
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Jakobsen JC; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews.
    Gagnier JJ; Morgenstern H; Altman DG; Berlin J; Chang S; McCulloch P; Sun X; Moher D;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Aug; 13():106. PubMed ID: 24004523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterogeneity assessment in gastroenterology systematic reviews: an analysis of current practices.
    Heavener T; Richards J; Bird H; Vassar M
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 29176428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses.
    Garcia-Alamino JM; Bankhead C; Heneghan C; Pidduck N; Perera R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015888. PubMed ID: 29122784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews.
    Glasziou PP; Shepperd S; Brassey J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Mar; 10():23. PubMed ID: 20298582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-treatment subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Liu P; Ioannidis JPA; Ross JS; Dhruva SS; Luxkaranayagam AT; Vasiliou V; Wallach JD
    BMC Med; 2019 Oct; 17(1):188. PubMed ID: 31639007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicable or non-applicable: investigations of clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews.
    Chess LE; Gagnier JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():19. PubMed ID: 26883215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics.
    Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Michelaki I; Pandis N
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():90-94. PubMed ID: 29738788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.