These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11822269)
1. A unique approach for reducing specimen labeling errors: combining marketing techniques with performance improvement. Simpson JB Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 11822269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A FMEA clinical laboratory case study: how to make problems and improvements measurable. Capunzo M; Cavallo P; Boccia G; Brunetti L; Pizzuti S Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2004; 18(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 14968752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. To err is human: improving patient safety through failure mode and effect analysis. Woodhouse S; Burney B; Coste K Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2004; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 14968751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value stream mapping of the Pap test processing procedure: a lean approach to improve quality and efficiency. Michael CW; Naik K; McVicker M Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 May; 139(5):574-83. PubMed ID: 23596108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs. Novis DA Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using performance improvement strategies to reduce and prevent medication errors. 1. Bumpus L; al-Assaf AF J Cardiovasc Manag; 2003; 14(6):15-8. PubMed ID: 14679883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of a Lean quality improvement implementation program on surgical pathology specimen accessioning and gross preparation error frequency. Smith ML; Wilkerson T; Grzybicki DM; Raab SS Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Sep; 138(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 22912352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Barriers to the implementation of patient safety initiatives. Grzybicki DM Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):901-11, vi. PubMed ID: 15555748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing major identification errors within a deployed phlebotomy process. Bologna LJ; Lind C; Riggs RC Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11828783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing specimen identification errors. Rees S; Stevens L; Mikelsons D; Quam E; Darcy T J Nurs Care Qual; 2012; 27(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 22446504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From talk to action: what performance improvement is really all about. Newmark J Radiol Manage; 2007; 29(3):18-30; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 17608292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Building an idealized measurement system to improve clinical office practice performance. Hess AM; Nelson EC; Johnson DJ; Wasson JH Manag Care Q; 1999; 7(3):22-34. PubMed ID: 10620956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing healthcare organization management. Chow CW; Ganulin D; Teknika O; Haddad K; Williamson J J Healthc Manag; 1998; 43(3):263-80. PubMed ID: 10181801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Life after phlebotomy deployment: reducing major patient and specimen identification errors. Bologna LJ; Mutter M J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11813527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. IRQN award article: labeling defects in radiology. Glenn L J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):720-2. PubMed ID: 17903758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: failure mode effects analysis. Apkon M; Leonard J; Probst L; DeLizio L; Vitale R Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Aug; 13(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15289629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]