199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11822900)
1. Internal and external mass transfer in biofilms grown at various flow velocities.
Beyenal H; Lewandowski Z
Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 11822900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of fluid shear on the structure and material properties of sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms.
Dunsmore BC; Jacobsen A; Hall-Stoodley L; Bass CJ; Lappin-Scott HM; Stoodley P
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 29(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 12483477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Growth, structure and oxygen penetration in particle supported autotrophic biofilms.
Boessmann M; Neu TR; Horn H; Hempel DC
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):371-7. PubMed ID: 15303764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring local flow velocities and biofilm structure in biofilm systems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Manz B; Volke F; Goll D; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Nov; 84(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 14574699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology.
Stoodley P; Lewandowski Z; Boyle JD; Lappin-Scott HM
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Oct; 65(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 10440674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Behaviour of biofilm systems under varying hydrodynamic conditions.
León Ohl A; Horn H; Hempel DC
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):345-51. PubMed ID: 15303760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofilm development in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor: effect of flow velocity on performance.
Casey E; Glennon B; Hamer G
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Feb; 67(4):476-86. PubMed ID: 10620763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E. coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow.
Teodósio JS; Simões M; Melo LF; Mergulhão FJ
Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21082456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena.
Stoodley P; Cargo R; Rupp CJ; Wilson S; Klapper I
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 29(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12483479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic characterization of external and internal mass transport in heterotrophic biofilms from microsensors measurements.
Guimerà X; Dorado AD; Bonsfills A; Gabriel G; Gabriel D; Gamisans X
Water Res; 2016 Oct; 102():551-560. PubMed ID: 27423049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Architectural adaptation and protein expression patterns of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis biofilms under laminar flow conditions.
Mangalappalli-Illathu AK; Lawrence JR; Swerhone GD; Korber DR
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):109-20. PubMed ID: 18261816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online assessment of biofilm development, sloughing and forced detachment in tube reactor by means of magnetic resonance microscopy.
Wagner M; Manz B; Volke F; Neu TR; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Sep; 107(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 20506514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow.
Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC; Heijnen JJ
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2001 Jan; 72(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 11114658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulation of growth and detachment in biofilm systems under defined hydrodynamic conditions.
Horn H; Reiff H; Morgenroth E
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Mar; 81(5):607-17. PubMed ID: 12514810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Buiter J; Riviere M; van der Meer WG; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):689-702. PubMed ID: 19836048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of fluid shear and AICI3 on the material properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Desulfovibrio sp. EX265 biofilms.
Stoodley P; Jacobsen A; Dunsmore BC; Purevdorj B; Wilson S; Lappin-Scott HM; Costerton JW
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(6):113-20. PubMed ID: 11381956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating trends in biofilm density using the UMCCA model.
Laspidou CS; Rittmann BE
Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3362-72. PubMed ID: 15276753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D finite element model of biofilm detachment using real biofilm structures from CLSM data.
Böl M; Möhle RB; Haesner M; Neu TR; Horn H; Krull R
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 May; 103(1):177-86. PubMed ID: 19191328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stratification in the cohesion of biofilms grown under various environmental conditions.
Derlon N; Massé A; Escudié R; Bernet N; Paul E
Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2102-10. PubMed ID: 18086485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress-sensitive nutrient consumption via steady and non-reversing dynamic shear in continuous-flow rotational bioreactors.
Belfiore LA; Bonani W; Leoni M; Belfiore CJ
Biophys Chem; 2009 May; 141(2-3):140-52. PubMed ID: 19261374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
