These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11823788)

  • 1. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations.
    Dekkers JC; Hospital F
    Nat Rev Genet; 2002 Jan; 3(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11823788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology.
    Williams JL
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding.
    Cooper M; van Eeuwijk FA; Hammer GL; Podlich DW; Messina C
    Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2009 Apr; 12(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 19282235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The effectiveness of selection for the DNA markers of quantitative trait loci in maize populations].
    Domeniuk VP; Bielousov AO; Syvolap IuM
    Tsitol Genet; 2004; 38(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 15098447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations.
    Garant D; Kruuk LE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1843-59. PubMed ID: 15910310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding quantitative genetic variation.
    Barton NH; Keightley PD
    Nat Rev Genet; 2002 Jan; 3(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 11823787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SASQuant: a SAS software program to estimate genetic effects and heritabilities of quantitative traits in populations consisting of 6 related generations.
    Gusmini G; Wehner TC; Donaghy SB
    J Hered; 2007; 98(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 17602177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the genetic component of phenotypic variation in unpedigreed wild plants: tailoring genomic scan for within-population use.
    Herrera CM; Bazaga P
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jun; 18(12):2602-14. PubMed ID: 19457184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation for neutral markers is correlated with variation for quantitative traits in the plant pathogenic fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola.
    Zhan J; Linde CC; Jürgens T; Merz U; Steinebrunner F; McDonald BA
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Aug; 14(9):2683-93. PubMed ID: 16029470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of selection forms on genetic structure of domestic animals].
    Tarasiuk SI; Glazko VI
    Tsitol Genet; 2001; 35(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 11589048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic architecture of complex traits in plants.
    Holland JB
    Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2007 Apr; 10(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 17291822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of quantitative and molecular variation in agroforestry populations of the shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn) in Mali.
    Sanou H; Lovett PN; Bouvet JM
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jul; 14(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 15969738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divergent selection as revealed by P(ST) and QTL-based F(ST) in three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations along a coastal-inland gradient.
    Raeymaekers JA; Van Houdt JK; Larmuseau MH; Geldof S; Volckaert FA
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Feb; 16(4):891-905. PubMed ID: 17284219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding for salinity tolerance.
    Ashraf M; Akram NA; Mehboob-Ur-Rahman ; Foolad MR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 913():305-33. PubMed ID: 22895769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic selection.
    Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 18076469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic differentiation of neutral markers and quantitative traits in predominantly selfing metapopulations: confronting theory and experiments with Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Porcher E; Giraud T; Lavigne C
    Genet Res; 2006 Feb; 87(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16545147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Possible uses of genetic markers for improving fertility and health in swine production].
    Steinheuer R; Drögemüller C; Hamann H; Distl O
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Jun; 110(6):255-65. PubMed ID: 12866259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic improvement of dairy cow reproductive performance.
    Berglund B
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Jul; 43 Suppl 2():89-95. PubMed ID: 18638109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.
    Hayes BJ; Chamberlain AJ; McPartlan H; Macleod I; Sethuraman L; Goddard ME
    Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 18208627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [DNA-marking of quantitative traits in corn].
    Domeniuk VP; Belousov AA; Sivolap IuM
    Tsitol Genet; 2002; 36(6):9-15. PubMed ID: 12557478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.