These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11824680)

  • 1. Shared values, social trust, and the perception of geographic cancer clusters.
    Siegrist M; Cvetkovich GT; Gutscher H
    Risk Anal; 2001 Dec; 21(6):1047-53. PubMed ID: 11824680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public meetings about suspected cancer clusters: the impact of voice, interactional justice, and risk perception on attendees' attitudes in six communities.
    McComas KA; Trumbo CW; Besley JC
    J Health Commun; 2007 Sep; 12(6):527-49. PubMed ID: 17763051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perceived health risks of indoor radon gas and overhead powerlines: a comparative multilevel approach.
    Poortinga W; Cox P; Pidgeon NF
    Risk Anal; 2008 Feb; 28(1):235-48. PubMed ID: 18304120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Things to know and do about cancer clusters.
    Aldrich T; Sinks T
    Cancer Invest; 2002; 20(5-6):810-6. PubMed ID: 12206154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology.
    Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2000 Apr; 20(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 10859780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks.
    Siegrist M; Earle TC; Gutscher H
    Risk Anal; 2003 Aug; 23(4):705-16. PubMed ID: 12926564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: four opinion clusters.
    Seidl R; Moser C; Stauffacher M; Krütli P
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jun; 33(6):1038-48. PubMed ID: 23020311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Components of social capital and socio-psychological factors that worsen the perceived health of Japanese males and females.
    Tsunoda H; Yoshino R; Yokoyama K
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2008 Oct; 216(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 18832800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust in scientific experts on obesity: implications for awareness and behavior change.
    Bleich S; Blendon R; Adams A
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Aug; 15(8):2145-56. PubMed ID: 17712134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual- and community-level effects on risk perception in cancer cluster investigations.
    Trumbo CW; McComas KA; Besley JC
    Risk Anal; 2008 Feb; 28(1):161-78. PubMed ID: 18304114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of mobile phone and base station risks.
    Siegrist M; Earle TC; Gutscher H; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1253-64. PubMed ID: 16297229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the public imagines the energy future: Exploring and clustering non-experts' techno-economic expectations towards the future energy system.
    Braunreiter L; Stauffacher M; Blumer YB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0227369. PubMed ID: 32134947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kastenholz H; Frey S; Wiek A
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 17362400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of physical environmental qualities on the social climate of supported housing facilities for people with severe mental illness.
    Marcheschi E; Brunt D; Hansson L; Johansson M
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2013 Feb; 34(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23369123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tangible evidence, trust and power: public perceptions of community environmental health studies.
    Scammell MK; Senier L; Darrah-Okike J; Brown P; Santos S
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jan; 68(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 18995942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact on social capital of mobility disability and weight status: the Stockholm Public Health Cohort.
    Norrbäck M; de Munter J; Tynelius P; Ahlström G; Rasmussen F
    Disabil Health J; 2015 Apr; 8(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 25445016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstructing communities in cluster trials?
    Lignou S; Das S; Mistry J; Alcock G; More NS; Osrin D; Edwards SJ
    Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():166. PubMed ID: 27020947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.
    Liu P; Yang R; Xu Z
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):326-341. PubMed ID: 30059602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lay and expert interpretations of cancer cluster evidence.
    Levy AG; Weinstein N; Kidney E; Scheld S; Guarnaccia P
    Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1531-8. PubMed ID: 18795998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia.
    Buys L; Aird R; van Megen K; Miller E; Sommerfeld J
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 23825246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.