These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11824696)

  • 1. Drug court effectiveness: a review of California evaluation reports, 1995-1999.
    Guydish J; Wolfe E; Tajima B; Woods WJ
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2001; 33(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 11824696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspectives on the drug court model across systems: a process evaluation.
    Wolfe EL; Guydish J; Woods W; Tajima B
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2004 Sep; 36(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 15559684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. California drug courts: outcomes, costs and promising practices: an overview of Phase II in a statewide study.
    Carey SM; Finigan M; Crumpton D; Waller M
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2006 Nov; Suppl 3():345-56. PubMed ID: 17357526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lifting the cover on drug courts: evaluation findings and policy concerns.
    Sanford JS; Arrigo BA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2005 Jun; 49(3):239-59. PubMed ID: 15851506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Sacramento Dependency Drug Court: development and outcomes.
    Boles SM; Young NK; Moore T; DiPirro-Beard S
    Child Maltreat; 2007 May; 12(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 17446569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Juvenile drug courts: emerging outcomes and key research issues.
    Henggeler SW
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2007 May; 20(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 17415076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. California drug courts: a methodology for determining costs and avoided costs.
    Byrne F; Schauffler R; Lightman L; Finigan M; Carey S
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2004 May; Suppl 2():147-56. PubMed ID: 15279127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A decade of drug treatment court research.
    Turner S; Longshore D; Wenzel S; Deschenes E; Greenwood P; Fain T; Harrell A; Morral A; Taxman F; Iguchi M; Greene J; McBride D
    Subst Use Misuse; 2002; 37(12-13):1489-527. PubMed ID: 12487232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review of the impact of adult drug-treatment courts.
    Brown RT
    Transl Res; 2010 Jun; 155(6):263-74. PubMed ID: 20478542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are effective drug courts an urban phenomenon?: considering their impact on recidivism among a nonmetropolitan adult sample in Washington State.
    Galloway AL; Drapela LA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 16648383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving graduation rates for African Americans in drug court: Importance of human relationships and barriers to gaining and sustaining employment.
    Gallagher JR; Nordberg A; Dibley AR
    J Ethn Subst Abuse; 2019; 18(3):387-401. PubMed ID: 29144881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining the Impact of Prior Criminal Justice History on 2-Year Recidivism Rates: A Comparison of Drug Court Participants and Program Referrals.
    Shannon LM; Jackson Jones A; Newell J; Neal C
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(2):291-312. PubMed ID: 27125834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extending Recidivism Monitoring for Drug Courts: Methods Issues and Policy Implications.
    DeVall KE; Gregory PD; Hartmann DJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Jan; 61(1):80-99. PubMed ID: 26063544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological, ethical, and legal considerations in drug court research.
    DeMatteo D; Filone S; Laduke C
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(6):806-20. PubMed ID: 21971950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Drug Court Outcome Evaluation Comparing Arrests in a Two Year Follow-up Period.
    Guydish JR
    J Drug Issues; 2002 Sep; 32(4):1155-1172. PubMed ID: 21528100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problem-solving courts in Canada: A review and a call for empirically-based evaluation methods.
    Slinger E; Roesch R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 20663560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of a halfway house for civilly committed narcotics addicts.
    Berecochea JE; Sing GE
    Int J Addict; 1972; 7(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 5043829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The drug court. A new strategy for drug use prevention.
    Schwartz JR; Schwartz LP
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1998 Mar; 25(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 9547770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dilemmas of coordinating treatment with criminal justice.
    Lissner AR; Gilmore J; Pompi KF
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 1976; 3(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 1036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings.
    Belenko S
    Subst Use Misuse; 2002; 37(12-13):1635-64. PubMed ID: 12487237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.