These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11825179)

  • 21. Evaluation of the implementation of an electronic medical record.
    Raman S; Harris IB; Connelly DP; Speedie SM; Daniels B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():979. PubMed ID: 14728483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?
    Loomis GA; Ries JS; Saywell RM; Thakker NR
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 12160503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange.
    Djalali S; Ursprung N; Rosemann T; Senn O; Tandjung R
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Nov; 84(11):920-32. PubMed ID: 26296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Increasing physician acceptance and use of the computerized ambulatory medical record.
    O'Dell DV; Tape TG; Campbell JR
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1991; ():848-52. PubMed ID: 1807727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Human factors considerations relevant to CPOE implementations.
    Saathoff A
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2005; 19(3):71-8. PubMed ID: 16045087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Primary care clinician attitudes towards ambulatory computerized physician order entry.
    Gandhi TK; Poon EG; Sequist TD; Johnson R; Pizziferri L; Karson AS; Bates DW
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():961. PubMed ID: 16779248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Report on attitudes about personal health records.
    Internet Healthc Strateg; 2004 Sep; 6(9):10-1. PubMed ID: 15526437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Academic physicians' assessment of the effects of computers on health care.
    Detmer WM; Friedman CP
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():558-62. PubMed ID: 7949990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. User requirements for the computerized patient record: physician opinions.
    Smith WR; Zastrow R
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():994. PubMed ID: 7950099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework.
    O'Donnell A; Kaner E; Shaw C; Haighton C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Nov; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 30424758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians' perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation.
    Doyle RJ; Wang N; Anthony D; Borkan J; Shield RR; Goldman RE
    Fam Pract; 2012 Oct; 29(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 22379185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a commercial electronic medical record (EMR) by primary care physicians 5 years after implementation.
    Kaelber D; Greco P; Cebul RD
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1002. PubMed ID: 16779289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: an empirical investigation.
    Hu PJ; Chau PY
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1999 May; 19(4):20-35. PubMed ID: 10387653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.
    Sittig DF; Kuperman GJ; Fiskio J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():400-4. PubMed ID: 10566389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physician use of IT: results from the Deloitte Research Survey.
    Miller RH; Hillman JM; Given RS
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2004; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 14971083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Housestaff and attending physician knowledge of and attitude towards an EMR on the eve of implementation.
    Thomas D; Kushniruk A; Kannry J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():1133. PubMed ID: 18694230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing perceptions and use of a commercial electronic medical record (EMR) between primary care and subspecialty physicians.
    Allareddy V; Allareddy V; Kaelber DC
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():841. PubMed ID: 17238461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective.
    Aaronson JW; Murphy-Cullen CL; Chop WM; Frey RD
    Fam Med; 2001 Feb; 33(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 11271741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.