140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11825211)
1. Acceptability of computerized visual analog scale, time trade-off and standard gamble rating methods in patients and the public.
Lenert LA; Sturley AE
Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():364-8. PubMed ID: 11825211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering.
Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE
J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 22682377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of respondent acceptability of preference measures: discriminatory power of graphic positioning scale versus traditional scaling measures.
Franic DM; Pathak DS
Value Health; 2003; 6(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 12859590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity, feasibility and acceptability of time trade-off and standard gamble assessments in health valuation studies: a study in a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore.
Wee HL; Li SC; Xie F; Zhang XH; Luo N; Feeny D; Cheung YB; Machin D; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Value Health; 2008 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 18387064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.
Kim SH; Lee SI; Jo MW
Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3387-3397. PubMed ID: 28801862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study.
Kuta V; McNeely PD; Walling S; Bezuhly M
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 20(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 28524791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods. Applications in oesophageal cancer.
McNamee P; Glendinning S; Shenfine J; Steen N; Griffin SM; Bond J
Eur J Health Econ; 2004 Feb; 5(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15452769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.
Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Wong E; Griffith L; Guyatt GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17884597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of an internet-based disease trajectory decision tool for prostate cancer screening.
Bhatnagar V; Frosch DL; Tally SR; Hamori CJ; Lenert L; Kaplan RM
Value Health; 2009; 12(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 18637139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
Lin MR; Hwang HF; Chung KP; Huang C; Chen CY
Phys Ther; 2006 Mar; 86(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16506870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population preferences of undergoing brachioplasty for arm laxity.
Ibrahim AM; Sinno HH; Izadpanah A; Vorstenbosch J; Dionisopoulos T; Lee BT; Lin SJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Dec; 73 Suppl 2():S149-52. PubMed ID: 25046669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thigh laxity after massive weight loss: a utilities outcomes assessment.
Izadpanah A; Sinno H; Vorstenbosch J; Lee BT; Lin SJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 23788144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive impairment and preferences for current health.
King JT; Tsevat J; Roberts MS
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2009 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 19134191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The health utility of mild and severe dysphonia.
DeVore EK; Shrime MG; Wittenberg E; Franco RA; Song PC; Naunheim MR
Laryngoscope; 2020 May; 130(5):1256-1262. PubMed ID: 31381164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring health state preferences for hemophilia: development of a disease-specific utility instrument.
Wasserman J; Aday LA; Begley CE; Ahn C; Lairson DR
Haemophilia; 2005 Jan; 11(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 15660989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values.
Dolan P; Sutton M
Soc Sci Med; 1997 May; 44(10):1519-30. PubMed ID: 9160441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health values of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.
Sherman KE; Sherman SN; Chenier T; Tsevat J
Arch Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 164(21):2377-82. PubMed ID: 15557419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
