These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1182607)
1. Dimensions of perception of exotic and pre-renaissance paintings. Berlyne DE Can J Psychol; 1975 Jun; 29(2):151-73. PubMed ID: 1182607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception, memory and aesthetics of indeterminate art. Ishai A; Fairhall SL; Pepperell R Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jul; 73(4-6):319-24. PubMed ID: 17562398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Style follows content: on the microgenesis of art perception. Augustin MD; Leder H; Hutzler F; Carbon CC Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 18164689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Art in the eye of the beholder: the perception of art during monocular viewing. Finney GR; Heilman KM Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Mar; 21(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 18327016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Leder H; Carbon CC; Ripsas AL Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):176-98. PubMed ID: 16289075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural correlates of object indeterminacy in art compositions. Fairhall SL; Ishai A Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):923-32. PubMed ID: 17714955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ambiguities and conventions in the perception of visual art. Mamassian P Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(20):2143-53. PubMed ID: 18619482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artistic forms and complexity. Boon JP; Casti J; Taylor RP Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2011 Apr; 15(2):265-83. PubMed ID: 21382264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Locher P; Krupinski EA; Mello-Thoms C; Nodine CF Spat Vis; 2007; 21(1-2):55-77. PubMed ID: 18073051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in reactions to paintings by male and female college students. Polzella DJ Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 11011895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Migraine art in the Internet: a study of 450 contemporary artists. Podoll K Int Rev Neurobiol; 2006; 74():89-107. PubMed ID: 16730509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Line spacing in Mondrian paintings and computer-generated modifications. Wolach AH; McHale MA J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jul; 132(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 16011076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual rating of paintings from different artistic styles as a function of semantic differential scales and exposure time. Bachmann T; Vipper K Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1983; 135(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 6670931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abstract art paintings, global image properties, and verbal descriptions: An empirical and computational investigation. Hayn-Leichsenring GU; Kenett YN; Schulz K; Chatterjee A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102936. PubMed ID: 31743852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Redies C Spat Vis; 2007; 21(1-2):97-117. PubMed ID: 18073053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seeing the mind behind the art. People can distinguish abstract expressionist paintings from highly similar paintings by children, chimps, monkeys, and elephants. Hawley-Dolan A; Winner E Psychol Sci; 2011 Apr; 22(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 21372327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Proportions of the esthetic face in comparison with figurative art]. Steinhäuser EW Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1989; 34():1-4. PubMed ID: 2731847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]