These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11827075)

  • 21. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Post-categorical processing and attenuation of the auditory suffix: evidence from both immediate and delayed suffixes.
    Miles C; Westley DP; Buller MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Sep; 89(3):261-82. PubMed ID: 7572269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall.
    Frick RW
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):551-62. PubMed ID: 2796740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A feature model of immediate memory.
    Nairne JS
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):251-69. PubMed ID: 2192233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Voice-specific information and the 20-second delayed-suffix effect.
    Balota DA; Duchek JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 2945897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.
    Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 2522515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some evidence for 'speech' as an acoustic feature.
    Morton J; Chambers SM
    Br J Psychol; 1976 Feb; 67(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 1268450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory recency in immediate memory.
    Surprenant AM; Pitt MA; Crowder RG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1993 May; 46(2):193-223. PubMed ID: 8316636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
    Beaman CP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The sandwich effect reassessed: effects of streaming, distraction, and modality.
    Nicholls AP; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11958357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory.
    Farrand P; Jones D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 8920100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.
    Jones D; Madden C; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 May; 44(4):645-69. PubMed ID: 1615168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cognitive control of auditory distraction: impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account.
    Hughes RW; Hurlstone MJ; Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):539-53. PubMed ID: 22731996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.