These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11827076)

  • 1. A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.
    Reder LM; Angstadt P; Cary M; Erickson MA; Ayers MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):138-52. PubMed ID: 11827076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.
    Reder LM; Nhouyvanisvong A; Schunn CD; Ayers MS; Angstadt P; Hiraki K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):294-320. PubMed ID: 10764098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.
    Park H; Reder LM; Dickison D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):568-78. PubMed ID: 15910138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The similarities (and familiarities) of pseudowords and extremely high-frequency words: examining a familiarity-based explanation of the pseudoword effect.
    Ozubko JD; Joordens S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):123-39. PubMed ID: 21058876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.
    Estes WK; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1003-18. PubMed ID: 12450328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Building permanent memory codes: codification and repetition effects in word identification.
    Salasoo A; Shiffrin RM; Feustel TC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1985 Mar; 114(1):50-77. PubMed ID: 3156946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthographic neighborhood size effects and associative recognition.
    Glanc GA; Greene RL
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 19353931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exposure to print and word recognition processes.
    Chateau D; Jared D
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 10714145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity reductions in false recognition: a measure of false memories with stronger theoretical implications.
    Westerberg CE; Marsolek CJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):747-59. PubMed ID: 14516210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by midazolam.
    Malmberg KJ; Zeelenberg R; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):540-9. PubMed ID: 14979823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.
    Ozubko JD; Gopie N; MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 22127849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of vowel diacritics for the temporary retention of high and low frequency Hebrew words of varying syllabic length.
    Vaknin-Nusbaum V; Miller P
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):516-26. PubMed ID: 21264614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.
    Malmberg KJ; Holden JE; Shiffren RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 14979807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A context noise model of episodic word recognition.
    Dennis S; Humphreys MS
    Psychol Rev; 2001 Apr; 108(2):452-78. PubMed ID: 11381837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: the role of instructions.
    Geraci L; McCabe DP; Guillory JJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 19477141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1379-96. PubMed ID: 9835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.