These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11827077)

  • 21. Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments.
    Meiser T; Sattler C; Weisser K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):32-49. PubMed ID: 18194053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A benefit of context reinstatement to recognition memory in aging: the role of familiarity processes.
    Ward EV; Maylor EA; Poirier M; Korko M; Ruud JCM
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2017 Nov; 24(6):735-754. PubMed ID: 27849132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory.
    Guttentag RE; Carroll D
    Memory; 1994 Sep; 2(3):255-73. PubMed ID: 7584295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.
    Hockley WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1412-29. PubMed ID: 18980405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Kishiyama MM; Yonelinas AP
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1045-51. PubMed ID: 14704019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Memory for multidimensional source information.
    Meiser T; Bröder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):116-37. PubMed ID: 11827074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recollection reduces unitised familiarity effect.
    Shao H; Opitz B; Yang J; Weng X
    Memory; 2016; 24(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 25793354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differential effects of list strength on recollection and familiarity.
    Norman KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1083-94. PubMed ID: 12450334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Verbal predicates foster conscious recollection but not familiarity of a task-irrelevant perceptual feature--an ERP study.
    Ecker UK; Arend AM; Bergström K; Zimmer HD
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):679-89. PubMed ID: 19443243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.
    Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):723-32. PubMed ID: 11394676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recall and recognition in mild hypoxia: using covariance structural modeling to test competing theories of explicit memory.
    Quamme JR; Yonelinas AP; Widaman KF; Kroll NE; Sauvé MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(5):672-91. PubMed ID: 14725804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test.
    Eglit GM; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 39(2):173-189. PubMed ID: 27501116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Test context affects recollection and familiarity ratings: implications for measuring recognition experiences.
    Tousignant C; Bodner GE
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):994-1000. PubMed ID: 22309813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.
    Hockley WE; Consoli A
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jul; 27(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 10479824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing text representations with recognition: The interaction of domain knowledge and text coherence.
    Long DL; Wilson J; Hurley R; Prat CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 16822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.
    Estes WK; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1003-18. PubMed ID: 12450328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.