These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11827079)

  • 21. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Mahon BZ; Costa A; Peterson R; Vargas KA; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for.
    Murphy GL; Wisniewski EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):572-86. PubMed ID: 2526854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.
    Josephs EL; Draschkow D; Wolfe JM; Võ ML
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():100-108. PubMed ID: 27270227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior.
    Cornelissen TH; Võ ML
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):154-168. PubMed ID: 27645215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acquiring experiential traces in word-referent learning.
    Richter T; Zwaan RA; Hoever I
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1187-96. PubMed ID: 19933461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code?
    Jescheniak JD; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Wagner V; Mädebach A; Schriefers H
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 19261579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.
    Carr TH; McCauley C; Sperber RD; Parmelee CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):757-77. PubMed ID: 6218234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.
    Yee E; Sedivy JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16478336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Local and global contextual constraints on the identification of objects in scenes.
    De Graef P; De Troy A; D'Ydewalle G
    Can J Psychol; 1992 Sep; 46(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 1486555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working memory and the guidance of visual attention: consonance-driven orienting.
    Huang L; Pashler H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 17546745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic category priming from the groundside of objects shown in nontarget locations and at unpredictable times.
    Flowers CS; Peterson MA
    J Vis; 2018 Dec; 18(13):3. PubMed ID: 30508428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.
    Lanthier SN; Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19145012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automatic access to object identity: attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important.
    Boucart M; Humphreys GW; Lorenceau J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):584-601. PubMed ID: 7790835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The direction of hemispheric asymmetries for object categorization at different levels of abstraction depends on the task.
    Studer T; Hübner R
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 18308442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial context in recognition.
    Bar M; Ullman S
    Perception; 1996; 25(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 8804097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information.
    Murray JE; Jones C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):609-25. PubMed ID: 12047062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects.
    Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.