143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11827085)
1. Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?
Roodenrys S; Hinton M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11827085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical.
Thorn AS; Frankish CR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):729-35. PubMed ID: 16060776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.
Gathercole SE; Frankish CR; Pickering SJ; Peaker S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 9949710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disentangling the Role of Biphone Probability From Neighborhood Density in the Perception of Nonwords.
Steffman J; Sundara M
Lang Speech; 2024 Mar; 67(1):166-202. PubMed ID: 37161351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
Janse E; Newman RS
Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of phoneme position overlap on the phonemic similarity effect in nonword recall.
Nimmo LM; Roodenrys S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):577-96. PubMed ID: 16627357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability of spoken words on event-related potentials.
Hunter CR
Brain Lang; 2013 Dec; 127(3):463-74. PubMed ID: 24129200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phoneme and Stress Programming Interact During Nonword Repetition Learning.
Meigh KM; Cobun E; Yunusova Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2219-2228. PubMed ID: 32628868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory.
Frauenfelder UH; Segui J; Dijkstra T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 2137525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception.
Gaskell MG; Marslen-Wilson WD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):380-96. PubMed ID: 9554092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning phonotactic-like regularities in immediate serial recall.
Fischer-Baum S; Warker JA; Holloway C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):129-146. PubMed ID: 31928028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
Buchner A; Mehl B; Rothermund K; Wentura D
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 17128604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition.
Edwards J; Beckman ME; Munson B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):421-36. PubMed ID: 15157141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?
Newman RS; Sawusch JR; Luce PA
Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):941-60. PubMed ID: 16496717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lexical and sublexical knowledge influences the encoding, storage, and articulation of nonwords.
Jones G; Witherstone HL
Mem Cognit; 2011 May; 39(4):588-99. PubMed ID: 21264593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lexical learning in bilingual adults: the relative importance of short-term memory for serial order and phonological knowledge.
Majerus S; Poncelet M; Van der Linden M; Weekes BS
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 18036515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis.
Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 10909142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
Beaman CP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]