148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11827136)
1. Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers' feedback.
Bruseberg A; McDonagh-Philp D
Appl Ergon; 2002 Jan; 33(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 11827136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual product evaluation: exploring users' emotional relationships with products.
McDonagh D; Bruseberg A; Haslam C
Appl Ergon; 2002 May; 33(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 12164507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The amount of ergonomics and user involvement in 151 design processes.
Kok BN; Slegers K; Vink P
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():989-96. PubMed ID: 22316850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usage centred research for everyday product design.
Kanis H
Appl Ergon; 1998 Feb; 29(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 9769092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating a web-based health risk assessment with tailored feedback: what does an expert focus group yield compared to a web-based end-user survey?
Vosbergen S; Mahieu GR; Laan EK; Kraaijenhagen RA; Jaspers MW; Peek N
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jan; 16(1):e1. PubMed ID: 24384408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the methodology and applications of anthropometry in ergonomics and product design.
Dianat I; Molenbroek J; Castellucci HI
Ergonomics; 2018 Dec; 61(12):1696-1720. PubMed ID: 30022717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ergonomic data of elderly people and their application in rehabilitation design.
Rogers N; Ward J; Brown R; Wright D
Disabil Rehabil; 1996 Oct; 18(10):487-96. PubMed ID: 8902420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Industrial designers' thinking in the stage of concept generation for social design: themes, strategies and modes.
Xiao Y; Jiang C
Int J Technol Des Educ; 2023; 33(1):281-311. PubMed ID: 36845874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ergonomics in consumer product evaluation: an evolving process.
Butters LM; Dixon RT
Appl Ergon; 1998 Feb; 29(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 9769089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introducing ergonomics requirements in the eco-design of energy-related products from users' behaviour approach.
Sierra-Pérez J; Boschmonart-Rives J; Oliver-Solà J
Ergonomics; 2019 Jul; 62(7):940-953. PubMed ID: 30909820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to integrate ergonomics into product design through the user centered design approach.
Reinert F; Gontijo LA
Work; 2019; 63(1):137-149. PubMed ID: 31127741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using archetypes to create user panels for usability studies: Streamlining focus groups and user studies.
Stavrakos SK; Ahmed-Kristensen S; Goldman T
Appl Ergon; 2016 Sep; 56():108-16. PubMed ID: 27184318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gradually including potential users: A tool to counter design exclusions.
Zitkus E; Langdon P; Clarkson PJ
Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():105-120. PubMed ID: 28958421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical device design process.
Gilman BL; Brewer JE; Kroll MW
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5609-12. PubMed ID: 19964397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cognitive ergonomics and the articulation of the functions of industrial products.
Oliveira ST; Heemann A
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():437-40. PubMed ID: 22316763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sizing up Australia: toward a national sizing survey.
Veitch D; Blewett V; Caple D
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4083-7. PubMed ID: 22317346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collaboration between Industrial Designers and Design Engineers - Comparing the Understanding of Design Intent.
Laursen ES; Møller L
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 217():367-71. PubMed ID: 26294499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Users/consumers differences regarding ergonomics and design theory and practice.
Dejean PH; Wagstaff P
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3641-5. PubMed ID: 22317276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is utility in the mind of the beholder? A study of ergonomics methods.
Stanton N; Young M
Appl Ergon; 1998 Feb; 29(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 9769088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards viable, useful and usable human factors design guidance.
Burns CM; Vicente KJ; Christoffersen K; Pawlak WS
Appl Ergon; 1997; 28(5-6):311-22. PubMed ID: 9414371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
