BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11827580)

  • 1. A comparison of the user-friendliness of hydroxyapatite and titanium ossicular prostheses.
    Yung MW; Brewis C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Feb; 116(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 11827580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Titanium prosthesis with malleus notch: a study of its 'user-friendliness'.
    Yung M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Oct; 121(10):938-42. PubMed ID: 17319984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses-a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome.
    Yung M; Smith P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):752-8. PubMed ID: 20502377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty.
    Truy E; Naiman AN; Pavillon C; Abedipour D; Lina-Granade G; Rabilloud M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 17529851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term hearing results using ossicular replacement prostheses of hydroxyapatite versus titanium.
    Lee JI; Yoo SH; Lee CW; Song CI; Yoo MH; Park HJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 272(10):2731-5. PubMed ID: 25193550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium versus hydroxyapatite implants.
    Gelfand YM; Chang CY
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jun; 144(6):954-8. PubMed ID: 21493321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term results using Kurz titanium ossicular implants.
    Vassbotn FS; Møller P; Silvola J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 264(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 17082946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ossicular chain prostheses.
    Pasha R; Hill SL; Burgio DL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Oct; 123(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 11020179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses.
    Schmerber S; Troussier J; Dumas G; Lavieille JP; Nguyen DQ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 263(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 16328409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of ossicular chain reconstruction with titanium ossicular replacement prosthesis in mastoidectomy with synchronous ossiculoplasty].
    Mao M; Zhai J; Chen G; Zhang J; Ma Z; Xue J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 28(10):708-11. PubMed ID: 25129971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ossiculoplasty With Titanium Prostheses in Patients With Intact Stapes: Comparison of TORP Versus PORP.
    Baker AB; O'Connell BP; Nguyen SA; Lambert PR
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Dec; 36(10):1676-82. PubMed ID: 26595718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Anatomical and functional results of ossiculoplasty with adjustable length titanium prostheses with and without hydroxyapatite].
    Diab KM; Daikhes NA; Pashchinina OA; Zukhba AG; Kondratchikov DS; Panina OS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2021; 86(3):14-19. PubMed ID: 34269018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing Outcomes after Ossicular Reconstruction with Removal of the Malleus.
    Haberman RS; Salapatas AM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jan; 158(1):144-150. PubMed ID: 28849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ossiculoplasty with composite prostheses. PORP and TORP.
    Goldenberg RA
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 27(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 7984372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.
    Şevik Eliçora S; Erdem D; Dinç AE; Damar M; Bişkin S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):773-780. PubMed ID: 27837423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of partial vs. total ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium prosthesis: a retrospective cohort study.
    Faramarzi M; Roosta S; Faramarzi A; Kherad M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 280(8):3567-3575. PubMed ID: 36715736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes following ossicular chain reconstruction with composite prostheses: hydroxyapatite-polyethylene vs. hydroxyapatite-titanium.
    Hahn Y; Bojrab DI
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2013 Jun; 92(6):250, 252, 254 passim. PubMed ID: 23780591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early results of titanium ossiculoplasty using the Kurz titanium prosthesis--a UK perspective.
    Siddiq MA; Raut VV
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jun; 121(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 17078898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing hearing outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing ossicular chain reconstruction.
    Govil N; Kaffenberger TM; Shaffer AD; Chi DH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():60-65. PubMed ID: 28688567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incus interposition and ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite prostheses.
    Wehrs RE
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 27(4):677-88. PubMed ID: 7984369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.