These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11828783)

  • 1. Reducing major identification errors within a deployed phlebotomy process.
    Bologna LJ; Lind C; Riggs RC
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11828783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life after phlebotomy deployment: reducing major patient and specimen identification errors.
    Bologna LJ; Mutter M
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11813527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.
    Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recentralizing phlebotomy back into the laboratory.
    Warner JL
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2005 Jul; 19(4):E3. PubMed ID: 16045821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Four indefensible phlebotomy errors and how to prevent them.
    Ernst DJ
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1998; 18(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 10185077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing medical errors through barcoding at the point of care.
    Nichols JH; Bartholomew C; Brunton M; Cintron C; Elliott S; McGirr J; Morsi D; Scott S; Seipel J; Sinha D
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2004; 18(6):328-34. PubMed ID: 15597554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors.
    Da Rin G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 19302988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specimen labeling QI project cuts error rate.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Dec; 13(12):137-8. PubMed ID: 17153049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical errors: impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas.
    Kalra J
    Clin Biochem; 2004 Dec; 37(12):1052-62. PubMed ID: 15589810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictable and avoidable human errors in phlebotomy area - an exclusive analysis from a tertiary health care system blood bank.
    Pandey P; Chaudhary R; Tondon R; Khetan D
    Transfus Med; 2007 Oct; 17(5):375-8. PubMed ID: 17903139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy.
    Morrison AP; Tanasijevic MJ; Goonan EM; Lobo MM; Bates MM; Lipsitz SR; Bates DW; Melanson SE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):870-7. PubMed ID: 20472844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Barcodes: streamlining specimen collection.
    Landek D
    Healthc Inform; 1996 Aug; 13(8):80-1, 83. PubMed ID: 10159906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of non-analytical factors on the quality of laboratory results.
    Manochiopinij S; Sirisali K; Leelahakul P
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():50-3. PubMed ID: 10926259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phlebotomy on trial.
    Ernst DJ
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1999 Apr; 31(4):46-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10387255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen-labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center.
    Francis DL; Prabhakar S; Sanderson SO
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 104(4):972-5. PubMed ID: 19259073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the accuracy of specimen labeling.
    Dock B
    Clin Lab Sci; 2005; 18(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 16315737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing.
    Lippi G; Salvagno GL; Montagnana M; Franchini M; Guidi GC
    Clin Lab; 2006; 52(5-6):217-30. PubMed ID: 16812947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Getting to the point: integrating critical care tests in the patient care setting.
    DuBois JA
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Jun; 32(6):52-6. PubMed ID: 11066400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of ABO discrepancies occurring in 35 French hospitals.
    Chiaroni J; Legrand D; Dettori I; Ferrera V
    Transfusion; 2004 Jun; 44(6):860-4. PubMed ID: 15157252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specimen labeling errors: a Q-probes analysis of 147 clinical laboratories.
    Wagar EA; Stankovic AK; Raab S; Nakhleh RE; Walsh MK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 132(10):1617-22. PubMed ID: 18834220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.