These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1182995)

  • 1. Scatchard plot and heterogeneity in binding affinity of labeled and unlabeled ligand.
    Hollemans HJ; Bertina RM
    Clin Chem; 1975 Nov; 21(12):1769-73. PubMed ID: 1182995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of ligand heterogeneity on the Scatchard plot. Particular relevance to lipoprotein binding analysis.
    Mendel CM; Licko V; Kane JP
    J Biol Chem; 1985 Mar; 260(6):3451-5. PubMed ID: 2982861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative method of analyzing the interaction of slightly selective radioligands with multiple receptor subtypes.
    McGonigle P; Neve KA; Molinoff PB
    Mol Pharmacol; 1986 Oct; 30(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 2876374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interaction of protein with a self-associating ligand. Deviation from a hyperbolic binding curve and the appearance of apparent co-operativity in the Scatchard plot.
    Ishida T; Horiike K; Tojo H; Nozaki M
    J Theor Biol; 1988 Jan; 130(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 3419173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of cooperativity on the determination of dissociation constants: examination of the Cheng-Prusoff equation, the Scatchard analysis, the Schild analysis and related power equations.
    Cheng HC
    Pharmacol Res; 2004 Jul; 50(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 15082026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Requirements for reliable determination of binding affinity constants by saturation analysis approach.
    Borgna JL
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2004 Dec; 92(5):419-33. PubMed ID: 15698547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated data processing and radioassays.
    Samols E; Barrows GH
    Semin Nucl Med; 1978 Apr; 8(2):163-79. PubMed ID: 684443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis on the slope of Scatchard plots.
    Henis YI; Levitzki A
    Eur J Biochem; 1976 Dec; 71(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 1009963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple method for calculating the dissociation constant of a receptor (or enzyme).unlabeled ligand complex from radioligand displacement measurements.
    Martin RL; Renosto F; Segel IH
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 1991 Jan; 284(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 1989501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding of hormones to receptors. An alternative explanation of nonlinear Scatchard plots.
    Taylor SI
    Biochemistry; 1975 Jun; 14(11):2357-61. PubMed ID: 166655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of receptor binding displacement curves by a nonhomologous ligand, on the basis of an equivalent competition principle.
    van Zoelen EJ
    Anal Biochem; 1992 Feb; 200(2):393-9. PubMed ID: 1321566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new, simple and robust radioligand binding method used to determine kinetic off-rate constants for unlabeled ligands. Application at α2A- and α2C-adrenoceptors.
    Uhlén S; Schiöth HB; Jahnsen JA
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 788():113-121. PubMed ID: 27318322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of ligand-binding data without knowledge of bound or free ligand molar concentration.
    Le Bonniec B; Sauloy J; Ducrocq R; Elion J
    Anal Biochem; 1988 Oct; 174(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 3218740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative characterization of hormone receptors.
    Rodbard D; Munson PJ; Thakur AK
    Cancer; 1980 Dec; 46(12 Suppl):2907-18. PubMed ID: 7448735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo measurement of the affinity and density of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 in rat brain using 18F-FITM in small-animal PET.
    Yamasaki T; Fujinaga M; Kawamura K; Yui J; Hatori A; Ohya T; Xie L; Wakizaka H; Yoshida Y; Fukumura T; Zhang MR
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1601-7. PubMed ID: 22915159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competitive binding assays for high-affinity binders in the presence of endogenous ligands: application to biotin-binding proteins.
    Schreiber RW; Letavic MA; McGahan TJ; White HB
    Anal Biochem; 1991 Feb; 192(2):392-7. PubMed ID: 2035839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kinetic and equilibrium studies of Ah receptor-ligand binding: use of [125I]2-iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin.
    Bradfield CA; Kende AS; Poland A
    Mol Pharmacol; 1988 Aug; 34(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2842655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical and mathematical conditions for use of linearization methods for saturation-type radioassay data.
    Shaw W
    Clin Chem; 1982 May; 28(5):1196-7. PubMed ID: 7074904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of an antibody-antigen binding constant by enzyme immunoassay and a theory for analysis of competitive binding of two ligands to heterogeneous receptor.
    Yagisawa S; Tanimori H; Kitagawa T
    J Biochem; 1986 Mar; 99(3):793-802. PubMed ID: 3086297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation of association curves and 'Scatchard' plots of binding reactions where ligand and receptor are degraded or internalized.
    Beck JS; Goren HJ
    J Recept Res; 1983; 3(5):561-77. PubMed ID: 6323708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.