These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11830375)
1. Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices. Bellemans J; Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Van Audekercke R Knee; 2002 Feb; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11830375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques. Aşík M; Sener N Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11819017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices. Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus. Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures. Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study. Arnoczky SP; Lavagnino M Am J Sports Med; 2001; 29(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 11292034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical comparison of meniscal repair devices with mattress suture devices in vitro. Aros BC; Pedroza A; Vasileff WK; Litsky AS; Flanigan DC Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2010 Nov; 18(11):1594-8. PubMed ID: 20532866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus. Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Biomechanical Performance of the Latest All-Inside Meniscal Repair Devices. Barber FA; Howard MS; Ashraf W; Spenciner DB Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3001-3007. PubMed ID: 32315765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture. Song EK; Lee KB Arthroscopy; 1999 Oct; 15(7):726-32. PubMed ID: 10524820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Walsh SP; Evans SL; O'Doherty DM; Barlow IW Knee; 2001 Jun; 8(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11337243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Repair Constructs. Mitchell R; Pitts R; Kim YM; Matava MJ Arthroscopy; 2016 Jan; 32(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 26422709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures. Boenisch UW; Faber KJ; Ciarelli M; Steadman JR; Arnoczky SP Am J Sports Med; 1999; 27(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 10496581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]