356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11830473)
1. Precise quantification of minimal residual disease at day 29 allows identification of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and an excellent outcome.
Nyvold C; Madsen HO; Ryder LP; Seyfarth J; Svejgaard A; Clausen N; Wesenberg F; Jonsson OG; Forestier E; Schmiegelow K;
Blood; 2002 Feb; 99(4):1253-8. PubMed ID: 11830473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Treatment outcome of childhood standard-risk and median-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia with CCLG-2008 protocol].
Liu X; Zou Y; Wang H; Chen X; Ruan M; Chen Y; Yang W; Guo Y; Liu T; Zhang L; Wang S; Zhang J; Liu F; Cai X; Qi B; Chang L; Zhu X
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 52(6):449-54. PubMed ID: 25190166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Post-induction residual leukemia in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia quantified by PCR correlates with in vitro prednisolone resistance.
Schmiegelow K; Nyvold C; Seyfarth J; Pieters R; Rottier MM; Knabe N; Ryder LP; Madsen HO; Svejgaard A; Kaspers GJ
Leukemia; 2001 Jul; 15(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 11455975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated within the Interfant-99 protocol.
Van der Velden VH; Corral L; Valsecchi MG; Jansen MW; De Lorenzo P; Cazzaniga G; Panzer-Grümayer ER; Schrappe M; Schrauder A; Meyer C; Marschalek R; Nigro LL; Metzler M; Basso G; Mann G; Den Boer ML; Biondi A; Pieters R; Van Dongen JJ;
Leukemia; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1073-9. PubMed ID: 19212338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Multicenter evaluation of minimal residual disease monitoring in early induction therapy for treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Wu XJ; Liao N; Mai HR; Li XY; Wan WQ; Yang LH; Huang LB; Luo XQ; Tian C; Chen QW; Long XJ; He YY; Wang Y; Li ZG; Xu HG
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Mar; 62(4):337-344. PubMed ID: 38527504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of MRD-dynamics in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the MB-2002/2008 protocols.
Meleshko AN; Savva NN; Fedasenka UU; Romancova AS; Krasko OV; Eckert C; von Stackelberg A; Aleinikova OV
Leuk Res; 2011 Oct; 35(10):1312-20. PubMed ID: 21596436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal residual disease after induction is the strongest predictor of prognosis in intermediate risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia - long-term results of trial ALL-REZ BFM P95/96.
Eckert C; von Stackelberg A; Seeger K; Groeneveld TW; Peters C; Klingebiel T; Borkhardt A; Schrappe M; Escherich G; Henze G
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Apr; 49(6):1346-55. PubMed ID: 23265714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simplified minimal residual disease polymerase chain reaction method at early treatment points can stratify children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia into good and poor outcome groups.
Scrideli CA; Assumpção JG; Ganazza MA; Araújo M; Toledo SR; Lee ML; Delbuono E; Petrilli AS; Queiróz RP; Biondi A; Viana MB; Yunes JA; Brandalise SR; Tone LG
Haematologica; 2009 Jun; 94(6):781-9. PubMed ID: 19483156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prolonged persistence of PCR-detectable minimal residual disease after diagnosis or first relapse predicts poor outcome in childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Steenbergen EJ; Verhagen OJ; van Leeuwen EF; van den Berg H; Behrendt H; Slater RM; von dem Borne AE; van der Schoot CE
Leukemia; 1995 Oct; 9(10):1726-34. PubMed ID: 7564517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimal residual disease in cerebrospinal fluid at diagnosis: a more intensive treatment protocol was able to eliminate the adverse prognosis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Biojone E; Queiróz Rde P; Valera ET; Odashima NS; Takayanagui OM; Viana MB; Tone LG; Scrideli CA
Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Jan; 53(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 21774746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal residual disease quantification in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by real-time polymerase chain reaction using the SYBR green dye.
Li AH; Forestier E; Rosenquist R; Roos G
Exp Hematol; 2002 Oct; 30(10):1170-7. PubMed ID: 12384148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Monitoring of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its prognostic significance].
Xu XJ; Tang YM; Song H; Shi SW; Yang SL; Shen HQ; Wei J; Xu WQ; Pan BH; Zhao FY
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 48(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 20426951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular detection of minimal residual disease is a strong predictive factor of relapse in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia with medium risk features. A case control study of the International BFM study group.
Biondi A; Valsecchi MG; Seriu T; D'Aniello E; Willemse MJ; Fasching K; Pannunzio A; Gadner H; Schrappe M; Kamps WA; Bartram CR; van Dongen JJ; Panzer-Grümayer ER
Leukemia; 2000 Nov; 14(11):1939-43. PubMed ID: 11069029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)- and reverse transcription PCR-based minimal residual disease detection in long-term follow-up of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Gameiro P; Moreira I; Yetgin S; Papaioannou M; Potter MN; Prentice HG; Hoffbrand AV; Foroni L
Br J Haematol; 2002 Dec; 119(3):685-96. PubMed ID: 12437645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection using rearrangement of immunoglobulin/T cell receptor genes in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Shahkarami S; Mehrasa R; Younesian S; Yaghmaie M; Chahardouli B; Vaezi M; Rezaei N; Nikbakht M; Alimoghaddam K; Ghavamzadeh A; Tavakkoly-Bazzaz J; Ghaffari SH
Ann Hematol; 2018 Apr; 97(4):585-595. PubMed ID: 29392424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease in Pediatric Patients with
Xue YJ; Lu AD; Wang Y; Jia YP; Zuo YX; Zhang LP
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 31(5):1303-1308. PubMed ID: 37846676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation based on minimal residual disease response improves outcomes for children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the intermediate-risk group.
Eckert C; Henze G; Seeger K; Hagedorn N; Mann G; Panzer-Grümayer R; Peters C; Klingebiel T; Borkhardt A; Schrappe M; Schrauder A; Escherich G; Sramkova L; Niggli F; Hitzler J; von Stackelberg A
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(21):2736-42. PubMed ID: 23775972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 7-year experience in a pediatric hematology/oncology unit.
Katsibardi K; Moschovi MA; Braoudaki M; Papadhimitriou SI; Papathanasiou C; Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou F
Leuk Lymphoma; 2010 May; 51(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 20350276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal residual disease detection using real-time quantitative PCR analysis of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements in the non-MRD-based ALL IC-BFM 2002 protocol for childhood ALL: Slovak experience.
Kolenova A; Hikkel I; Ilencikova D; Hikkelova M; Sejnova D; Kaiserova E; Cizmar A; Puskacova J; Bubanska E; Oravkinova I; Gencik M
Neoplasma; 2010; 57(6):552-61. PubMed ID: 20845994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical significance of dynamic monitoring the minimal residual disease in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia by multiparameter flow cytometry].
Guo DD; Zhao WL; Zhang YL; Pang L; Che L; He HL; Chai YH; Ji ZH; Ji XQ
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 20(6):1346-51. PubMed ID: 23257430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
