137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11831091)
1. [Breast cancer screening--two years after].
Gøtzsche PC; Olsen O
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 11831091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years.
Feig SA
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(11):2035-9. PubMed ID: 9392324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast cancer screening by mammography: evaluation by Gotzsche and Olsen meta-analysis].
Agence Nationale d'Accrédiation et d'Evaluation en Santé
J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12741380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Miller AB
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2164; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breast cancer screening].
Day NE
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 11831092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening].
Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC
Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: overdiagnosis in the Malmö trial was considerably underestimated.
Gøtzsche PC
BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):727. PubMed ID: 16565135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Lee JH; Zuckerman D
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2164-5; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Over-diagnosis in breast cancer screening.
Møller H; Davies E
BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):691-2. PubMed ID: 16517549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reduced mortality with mammographic screening. The natural course, too rough methods resulted in miscalculation on breast cancer].
Rutqvist LE
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(10):1210-1. PubMed ID: 10193130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: overdiagnosis in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer screening.
Moss S
Breast Cancer Res; 2005; 7(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 16168145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Criticism of the Cochrane review on mammographic screening is not justified].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(5):653-4. PubMed ID: 11871223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening mammography.
Prescrire Int; 2006 Oct; 15(85):192-3. PubMed ID: 17128530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines.
Jackson VP
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 12409561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast screening in women aged 40-49 years: what next?
Dickersin K
Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1896-7. PubMed ID: 10371561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to Kopans.
Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 43():[1183 words; 9 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Thornton H
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2165; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Countering the counterpoint).
Baines CJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1512-3. PubMed ID: 14559872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Screening mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer: facts, controversies, and the implementation in Israel].
Allweis TM; Nissan A; Spira RM; Sklair-Levy M; Freund HR; Peretz T
Harefuah; 2003 Apr; 142(4):281-6, 317. PubMed ID: 12754879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
