These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11831232)

  • 1. A method for estimating preoperative bone volume for implant surgery.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 11831232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report.
    Zahrani AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
    Proussaefs P; Lozada J
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A nonradiologic method for estimating bone volume for dental implant placement in the completely edentulous arch.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 12500868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and histologic evaluation of bone-replacement grafts in the treatment of localized alveolar ridge defects. Part 1: Mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.
    Feuille F; Knapp CI; Brunsvold MA; Mellonig JT
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Feb; 23(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12617366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flapless dental implant placement.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 17520950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
    Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation.
    Le B; Burstein J; Sedghizadeh PP
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 18332757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method to assess the clinical outcome of ridge augmentation procedures.
    Proussaefs PT; Valencia G; Lozada J; Tatakis DN
    J Periodontol; 2002 Mar; 73(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 11922260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preservation of the negative image of tooth enamel with dental impression material enhances morphometric measurements of gingival overgrowth.
    Miller ML; Andringa A; Turner LT; Dalton TP; Derkenne S; Nebert DW
    Microsc Res Tech; 2003 Apr; 60(5):528-36. PubMed ID: 12619128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-surgical dental implant assessment by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Gray CF; Redpath TW; Smith FW
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 9151637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report.
    Tolstunov L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical application of maxillary endossenous implant with edentulous ridge expansion technique].
    Huang Y; Ou Y; Song G
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):374-6, 388. PubMed ID: 14650994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Splitting and widening of a narrow jaw ridge in the edentulous maxilla].
    de Wijs FL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Jul; 104(7):262-3. PubMed ID: 11924404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants.
    Kao RT; Fagan MC; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Mar; 36(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 18444430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.
    Toljanic JA; Baer RA; Ekstrand K; Thor A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 19587876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of combined ridge defect and osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement--a 36-month follow-up case report.
    AlGhamdi AS
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 19882818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gingival aesthetics, bone remodeling, and implant reconstructions.
    Polack MA; Arzadon JM
    Dent Today; 2010 Nov; 29(11):112, 114-8; quiz 119. PubMed ID: 21133026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement.
    van Kesteren CJ; Schoolfield J; West J; Oates T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 20556256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.