These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11831233)

  • 1. Mandibular bone growth induced by a hydroxylapatite-coated subperiosteal implant: a case report.
    Fish JM; Misch CE
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11831233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ramus hinges for excessive movements of the condyles: a new dimension in mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants.
    Linkow LI; Ghalili R
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10483422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of HA-coated subperiosteal implants.
    Minichetti JC
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(3):111-6; discussion 117-9. PubMed ID: 12837050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants.
    Fettig RH; Kay JF
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tripodal mandibular subperiosteal implant: basic sciences, operational procedures, and clinical data.
    Linkow LI; Wagner JR; Chanavaz M
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(1):16-36. PubMed ID: 9759037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (rhOP-1) placed with dental implants in fresh extraction sites.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Rueger DC
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 8699520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load characteristics and design principles of mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants.
    Wagner JR
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1289539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Severe mandibular atrophy treated with a subperiosteal implant and simultaneous graft with rhBMP-2 and mineralized allograft: a case report.
    Loperfido C; Mesquida J; Lozada JL
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):707-13. PubMed ID: 23574428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant.
    Schou S; Pallesen L; Hjørting-Hansen E; Pedersen CS; Fibaek B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 11168208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The subperiosteal implant as a viable long-term treatment modality in the severely atrophied mandible: a patient's 40-year case history.
    Kurtzman GM; Schwartz K
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 7473869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Status of the hydroxyapatite-coated unilateral subperiosteal implant using direct bone impressions.
    Stobaugh RK
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1310662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems associated with the atrophic mandible.
    Worthington P; Rubenstein JE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):129-60. PubMed ID: 9421674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histomorphometric analysis of a half hydroxyapatite-coated implant in humans: a pilot study.
    Iamoni F; Rasperini G; Trisi P; Simion M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 10531745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
    Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.