These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11831260)

  • 1. Do researchers feel an LREC hinders research?
    Ferguson P
    Bull Med Ethics; 2001 Feb; (165):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.
    Kent G
    J Med Ethics; 1997 Jun; 23(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 9220334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Views of National Health Service (NHS) Ethics Committee members on how education research should be reviewed.
    Brown J; Ryland I; Howard J; Shaw N
    Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):225-30. PubMed ID: 17701637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of local research ethics committees in the south Thames region.
    Holley S; Foster C
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1998; 32(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 9670151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study.
    Maskell NA; Jones EL; Davies RJ;
    QJM; 2003 Apr; 96(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 12651975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders.
    Lewis JC; Tomkins S; Sampson JR
    J Med Ethics; 2001 Oct; 27(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 11579194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.
    Foster CG; Marshall T; Moodie P
    J Med Ethics; 1995 Aug; 21(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 7473640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):21-34. PubMed ID: 20569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
    Kerrison S; Pollock AM
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 31(8):487-9. PubMed ID: 16076976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
    Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Another look at LREC annual reports.
    Godfrey E; Wray E; Nicholson R
    Bull Med Ethics; 2001 Sep; (171):13-21. PubMed ID: 11881662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus.
    Pachana NA; Liddle J; Peel NM; Beattie E; Juang C; Knight BG
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 43(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 25374104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LREC resigns unanimously.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 May; No. 128():3-6. PubMed ID: 11655046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local research ethics committees of the Mexican Institute of Social Security: results of a national survey.
    Valdez-Martinez E; Garduño-Espinosa J; Martinez-Salgado H; Porter JD
    Public Health; 2004 Jul; 118(5):329-36. PubMed ID: 15178139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical review of a multicentre study in Scotland: a weighty problem.
    al-Shahi R; Warlow CP
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1999; 33(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 10633333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.
    Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information giving in clinical trials: the views of medical researchers.
    Ferguson PR
    Bioethics; 2003 Feb; 17(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 12722736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Descriptive ethics: a qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico.
    Valdez-Martinez E; Turnbull B; Garduño-Espinosa J; Porter JD
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 May; 6(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 16594973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.