These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11831784)

  • 21. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Local effects of delayed food.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Mar; 87(2):241-60. PubMed ID: 17465314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.
    Mazur JE; Kralik JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):175-87. PubMed ID: 2299287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
    Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE; Romano A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Nov; 58(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 1447543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 3746189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers.
    Vargo KK; Ringdahl JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):643-62. PubMed ID: 26119287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resistance to extinction in the steady state and in transition.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 15839776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.
    Grace RC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):165-88. PubMed ID: 11029021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.
    Holtyn AF; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 23900853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How do reinforcers affect choice? Preference pulses after responses and reinforcers.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 28573713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preference pulses and the win-stay, fix-and-sample model of choice.
    Hachiga Y; Sakagami T; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 26420769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Key pecking during extinction after intermittent or continuous reinforcement as a function of the number of reinforcers delivered during training.
    Zarcone TJ; Branch MN; Hughes CE; Pennypacker HS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 9037782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timeout from concurrent schedules.
    Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 2299286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.