These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions. Davison MC; Hunter IW J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):233-44. PubMed ID: 501273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice. Grossbard CL; Mazur JE J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length. Spetch ML; Belke TW; Barnet RC; Dunn R; Pierce WD J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 2324664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate. Smith AP; Zentall TR J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The effects of changeover delays on local choice. Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays. Mazur JE; Coe D J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 3612019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule. Bell MC; Seip KM; Fitzsimmons KS Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17071019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Commitment using punishment. Green L; Rachlin H J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 May; 65(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 8636662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects. Dunn R; Spetch ML J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 2324663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer. Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Resistance to extinction, generalization decrement, and conditioned reinforcement. Dulaney AE; Bell MC Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 18243577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice. McDevitt MA; Williams BA J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The control of switching into blackout during extinction. Von Sturmer G; Beale IL; Davison MC J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 16811825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]