These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11831802)

  • 1. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Howard MA; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):972-83. PubMed ID: 9714917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C; Sininger YS; Ekelid M; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits.
    Howard MA; Stagner BB; Foster PK; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):279-93. PubMed ID: 12880041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+Ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Vázquez AE; Jimenez AM; Martin GK; Luebke AE; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15276680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The shape of 2f1-f2 suppression tuning curves reflects basilar membrane specializations in the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):151-60. PubMed ID: 7607981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits.
    Porter CA; Martin GK; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):884-900. PubMed ID: 16938977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions].
    Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Makishima K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1997 Aug; 100(8):839-45. PubMed ID: 9293764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of cochlear frequency resolution in the human auditory system.
    Abdala C; Sininger YS
    Ear Hear; 1996 Oct; 17(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 8909885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.
    Martin GK; Villasuso EI; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2003 Mar; 177(1-2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12618323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DPOAE suppression tuning: cochlear immaturity in premature neonates or auditory aging in normal-hearing adults?
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3155-62. PubMed ID: 11785816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear sensitivity in the lesser spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor.
    Wittekindt A; Drexl M; Kössl M
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Jan; 191(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15378333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Engler S; Köppl C; Manley GA; de Kleine E; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107835. PubMed ID: 31710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of continuous versus interrupted noise exposures on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Chang KW; Norton SJ
    Hear Res; 1996 Jul; 96(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 8817301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1465-76. PubMed ID: 11572357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.