These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11831808)

  • 1. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.
    Donath TM; Natke U; Kalveram KT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):357-66. PubMed ID: 11831808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex.
    Hain TC; Burnett TA; Larson CR; Kiran S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2146-52. PubMed ID: 11386566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: a preliminary study.
    Burnett TA; Senner JE; Larson CR
    J Voice; 1997 Jun; 11(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 9181544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses.
    Larson CR; Burnett TA; Kiran S; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):559-64. PubMed ID: 10641664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of Middle-Frequency Modulations in Vocal Fundamental Frequency to Different Vocal Intensities and Auditory Feedback.
    Lee SH; Fang TJ; Yu JF; Lee GS
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):536-544. PubMed ID: 28268129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.
    Xu Y; Larson CR; Bauer JJ; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1168-78. PubMed ID: 15376682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.
    ELman JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jul; 70(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7264071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control.
    Larson CR; Altman KW; Liu H; Hain TC
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 187(4):613-21. PubMed ID: 18340440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct and octave-shifted pitch matching during nonword imitations in men, women, and children.
    Peter B; Foster B; Haas H; Middleton K; McKibben K
    J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):260.e21-30. PubMed ID: 25439509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceiving a stranger's voice as being one's own: a 'rubber voice' illusion?
    Zheng ZZ; Macdonald EN; Munhall KG; Johnsrude IS
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18655. PubMed ID: 21490928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables.
    Natke U; Kalveram KT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 11407562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback.
    Burnett TA; Freedland MB; Larson CR; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3153-61. PubMed ID: 9637026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing.
    Natke U; Donath TM; Kalveram KT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1587-93. PubMed ID: 12656393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of hearing aid amplification on voice F0 variability in speakers with prelingual hearing loss.
    Lee GS; Liu C; Lee SH
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():1-8. PubMed ID: 23648550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sensitivity of auditory-motor representations to subtle changes in auditory feedback while singing.
    Keough D; Jones JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):837-46. PubMed ID: 19640048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.
    Jones JA; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1246-51. PubMed ID: 11008824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vocalization-induced enhancement of the auditory cortex responsiveness during voice F0 feedback perturbation.
    Behroozmand R; Karvelis L; Liu H; Larson CR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 120(7):1303-12. PubMed ID: 19520602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.
    Larson CR; Burnett TA; Bauer JJ; Kiran S; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):2845-8. PubMed ID: 11785786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of amplified and damped auditory feedback on vocal characteristics.
    Jónsdottir V; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Roininen H; Alastalo-Borenius M; Vilkman E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2001; 26(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 11769345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity.
    Alemi R; Lehmann A; Deroche MLD
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16860. PubMed ID: 33033324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.