BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11832874)

  • 21. Reliability and validity of bioelectrical impedance in determining body composition.
    Jackson AS; Pollock ML; Graves JE; Mahar MT
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1988 Feb; 64(2):529-34. PubMed ID: 3372410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of body composition measurement techniques.
    Hillier SE; Beck L; Petropoulou A; Clegg ME
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Dec; 27(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 24387134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players.
    Bayios IA; Bergeles NK; Apostolidis NG; Noutsos KS; Koskolou MD
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2006 Jun; 46(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 16823358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Empirically derived new equations for calculating body fat percentage based on skinfold thickness and midarm circumference in preschool Indian children.
    Shaikh S; Mahalanabis D
    Am J Hum Biol; 2004; 16(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 15101053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anthropometric prediction of DXA-measured percentage of fat mass in male karate athletes.
    Cavedon V; Sacristani F; Sandri M; Zancanaro C; Milanese C
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2023 Apr; 63(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 36305877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting football players' dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition using standard anthropometric measures.
    Oliver JM; Lambert BS; Martin SE; Green JS; Crouse SF
    J Athl Train; 2012; 47(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 22892406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validity of anthropometric equations for the estimation of body density in adolescent athletes.
    Thorland WG; Johnson GO; Tharp GD; Fagot TG; Hammer RW
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1984; 16(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 6708784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Body composition analysis of female adolescent athletes: comparing six regression equations.
    Webster BL; Barr SI
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 May; 25(5):648-53. PubMed ID: 8492694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of anthropometric variables to predict relative body fat determined by a four-compartment body composition model.
    van der Ploeg GE; Gunn SM; Withers RT; Modra AC
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):1009-16. PubMed ID: 12879096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of anthropometric characteristics in modern pentathlon performance in female athletes.
    Claessens AL; Hlatky S; Lefevre J; Holdhaus H
    J Sports Sci; 1994 Aug; 12(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 7932950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
    King S; Wilson J; Kotsimbos T; Bailey M; Nyulasi I
    Nutrition; 2005; 21(11-12):1087-94. PubMed ID: 16183254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationships between bioelectric impedance and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness measured by LIPOMETER and skinfold calipers in children.
    Jürimäe T; Sudi K; Payerl D; Leppik A; Jürimäe J; Müller R; Tafeit E
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Sep; 90(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 14504951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women.
    Aristizabal JC; Estrada-Restrepo A; Giraldo García A
    Colomb Med (Cali); 2018 Jun; 49(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 30104807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resting energy expenditure in elite athletes: development of new predictive equations based on anthropometric variables and bioelectrical impedance analysis derived phase angle.
    Marra M; Di Vincenzo O; Cioffi I; Sammarco R; Morlino D; Scalfi L
    J Int Soc Sports Nutr; 2021 Oct; 18(1):68. PubMed ID: 34702296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anthropometric correlates with strength performance among resistance trained athletes.
    Mayhew JL; Piper FC; Ware JS
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1993 Jun; 33(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 8412051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The evaluation of body composition in children by anthropometry and impedance measurement].
    Ferrante E; Pitzalis G; Deganello F; Galastri E; Sciarpelletti R; Imperato C
    Minerva Pediatr; 1993; 45(7-8):289-98. PubMed ID: 8255269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Muscle mass of competitive male athletes.
    Spenst LF; Martin AD; Drinkwater DT
    J Sports Sci; 1993 Feb; 11(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 8450582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Total body water in health and disease: Have anthropometric equations any meaning?
    Basile C; Vernaglione L; Bellizzi V; Lomonte C; Rubino A; D'Ambrosio N; Di Iorio B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1997-2002. PubMed ID: 18208903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimating body composition from skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis in cystic fibrosis patients.
    Alicandro G; Battezzati A; Bianchi ML; Loi S; Speziali C; Bisogno A; Colombo C
    J Cyst Fibros; 2015 Nov; 14(6):784-91. PubMed ID: 26282837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A physiological comparison of female body builders and power lifters.
    Johnson GO; Housh TJ; Powell DR; Ansorge CJ
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1990 Dec; 30(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 2079841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.