These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11833289)

  • 1. Quantitative genetics of autogamous F2.
    Gordon IL
    Hereditas; 2001; 134(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 11833289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative genetics of allogamous F2: an origin of randomly fertilized populations.
    Gordon IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Jul; 85 ( Pt 1)():43-52. PubMed ID: 10971690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refinements to the partitioning of the inbred genotypic variance.
    Gordon IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Jul; 91(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 12815457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimates of inbreeding in a natural population: a comparison of sampling properties.
    Curie-Cohen M
    Genetics; 1982 Feb; 100(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 7106561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on Q(ST), an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits.
    Goudet J; Büchi L
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1337-47. PubMed ID: 16322514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of Seven Tree Breeding Strategies Under Conditions of Inbreeding Depression.
    Wu HX; Hallingbäck HR; Sánchez L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jan; 6(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 26739644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantitative model of the relationship between phenotypic variance and heterozygosity at marker loci under partial selfing.
    David P
    Genetics; 1999 Nov; 153(3):1463-74. PubMed ID: 10545474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Joint effect of selection, linkage and partial inbreeding on additive genetic variance in an infinite population.
    Nomura T
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):527-40. PubMed ID: 16161809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimates of genetic variance in an F2 maize population.
    Wolf DP; Peternelli LA; Hallauer AR
    J Hered; 2000; 91(5):384-91. PubMed ID: 10994705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic variance components and heritability of multiallelic heterozygosity under inbreeding.
    Nietlisbach P; Keller LF; Postma E
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Jan; 116(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26174022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of inbreeding depression, non-inbred dominance deviations and random year-season effect in genetic trends for prolificacy in closed rabbit lines.
    Fernández EN; Sánchez JP; Martínez R; Legarra A; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 28685498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for the partial dominance of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus.
    Fu YB; Ritland K
    Genetics; 1994 Jan; 136(1):323-31. PubMed ID: 8138168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
    Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila- effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components.
    Kristensen TN; Sørensen AC; Sorensen D; Pedersen KS; Sørensen JG; Loeschcke V
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 16033547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Demontis D; Pertoldi C; Loeschcke V; Mikkelsen K; Axelsson T; Kristensen TN
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4551-63. PubMed ID: 19780974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dominance models with method R for stature of Holsteins.
    Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Fernando RL
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):975-8. PubMed ID: 9178138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
    Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.