These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11833543)

  • 1. Evaluation of protective shielding thickness for diagnostic radiology rooms: theory and computer simulation.
    Costa PR; Caldas LV
    Med Phys; 2002 Jan; 29(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 11833543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
    McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing strategies for operator eye protection in the interventional radiology suite.
    Thornton RH; Dauer LT; Altamirano JP; Alvarado KJ; St Germain J; Solomon SB
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1703-7. PubMed ID: 20920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo study of the energy spectra and transmission characteristics of scattered radiation from x-ray computed tomography.
    Platten DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 24894101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
    Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. X-ray spectroscopy applied to radiation shielding calculation in mammography.
    Künzel R; Levenhagen RS; Herdade SB; Terini RA; Costa PR
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3539-45. PubMed ID: 18777914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of computed tomography shielding design methods using RadShield.
    DeLorenzo MC; Yang K; Wu DH; Wang W; Rutel IB
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Jun; 37(2):492-505. PubMed ID: 28397710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a flattening filter free linear accelerator on structural shielding design.
    Jank J; Kragl G; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 23763984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray buildup factors of lead and its applications in shielding of diagnostic x-ray facilities.
    Kharrati H; Agrebi A; Karaoui MK
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17500471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of a leaden radiation protection barrier for dose reduction for the physician during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions].
    Haipt F; Kirsch M; Hosten N
    Rofo; 2010 Jun; 182(6):512-7. PubMed ID: 19941247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human exposure to space radiation: role of primary and secondary particles.
    Trovati S; Ballarini F; Battistoni G; Cerutti F; Fassò A; Ferrari A; Gadioli E; Garzelli MV; Mairani A; Ottolenghi A; Paretzke HG; Parini V; Pelliccioni M; Pinsky L; Sala PR; Scannicchio D; Zankl M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):362-6. PubMed ID: 17151013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalent dose to the fetus from occupational exposure of pregnant staff in diagnostic radiology.
    Osei EK; Kotre CJ
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 74(883):629-37. PubMed ID: 11509399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shielding requirements in helical tomotherapy.
    Baechler S; Bochud FO; Verellen D; Moeckli R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):5057-67. PubMed ID: 17671353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of different methods for shielding design in computed tomography.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Arandjic D; Kosutic D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 21743070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attenuation assessment of medical protective eyewear: the AVEN experience.
    Bertolini M; Benecchi G; Amici M; Piola A; Piccagli V; Giordano C; Nocetti L
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Jun; 36(2):279-89. PubMed ID: 27122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring scatter radiation in diagnostic X rays for radiation protection purposes.
    Vlachos I; Tsantilas X; Kalyvas N; Delis H; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):382-5. PubMed ID: 25911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of conversion coefficients relating air-kerma to H*(10) using primary and transmitted x-ray spectra in the diagnostic radiology energy range.
    Santos JC; Mariano L; Tomal A; Costa PR
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Mar; 36(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 26835613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Criteria for establishing shielding of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) rooms.
    Verdun FR; Aroua A; Baechler S; Schmidt S; Trueb PR; Bochud FO
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):403-9. PubMed ID: 20215444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.