166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11833569)
1. One unified policy recommended for all human research studies.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11833569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Universal protection for all human research participants.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11933953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Much more research to fall under IRB review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):3. PubMed ID: 11658059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection.
Childress JF
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Ethics Commission disbands.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Dec; 16(12):5. PubMed ID: 11933959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Policy advice for Congress.
Prot Hum Subj; 2000; ():5-6. PubMed ID: 12564439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Model federal policy on protection of human subjects is now final.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1991 Aug; 6(8):1-3. PubMed ID: 16145785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Indecision over human pesticide data.
Dove A
Nat Med; 1999 Sep; 5(9):972. PubMed ID: 10471263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In focus. The brief career of a government advisory committee: one members's perspective. The life and death of the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee (NHRPAC).
Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):W23. PubMed ID: 12778944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In sickness and in health.
Boyce N
New Sci; 1997 Oct; 156(2105):20-1. PubMed ID: 11656695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation of clinical research: who's protecting who from what?
Petricciani JC
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1979 Apr; 34(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 11661718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council].
Shelton JD
IRB; 1999; 21(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 11697393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendations for federal "super agency" would affect institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12530378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Taking the "I" out of IRB--and putting "community" in.
Marshall MF
Bioethics Forum; 2000; 16(4):7-12. PubMed ID: 11902185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NBAC recommendations on oversight of human subject research.
Lo B; Groman M
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):493-512. PubMed ID: 12715803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. President's Commission seeks information on reported violations of subject protection.
IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):9. PubMed ID: 11661887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
