These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11833664)

  • 61. Withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.
    Prendergast TJ
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2000 Jun; 35(6):91-2, 95-100,102. PubMed ID: 10884821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Good deaths, bad deaths, and preferences for the end of life: a qualitative study of geriatric outpatients.
    Vig EK; Davenport NA; Pearlman RA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2002 Sep; 50(9):1541-8. PubMed ID: 12383152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Shaping end-of-life care: behavioral economics and advance directives.
    Halpern SD
    Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 22875386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan.
    Tang ST; Liu TW; Lai MS; Liu LN; Chen CH
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 Dec; 30(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 16376737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes.
    Sam M; Singer PA
    CMAJ; 1993 May; 148(9):1497-502. PubMed ID: 8477368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Predictors of patient treatment preferences and spouse substituted judgments: the case of dialysis continuation.
    Pruchno RA; Lemay EP; Feild L; Levinsky NG
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 16525165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Knowing loved ones' end-of-life health care wishes: attachment security predicts caregivers' accuracy.
    Turan B; Goldstein MK; Garber AM; Carstensen LL
    Health Psychol; 2011 Nov; 30(6):814-8. PubMed ID: 22081941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital cost.
    Danis M; Mutran E; Garrett JM; Stearns SC; Slifkin RT; Hanson L; Williams JF; Churchill LR
    Crit Care Med; 1996 Nov; 24(11):1811-7. PubMed ID: 8917030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Preferences for prolonging life: a prospect theory approach.
    Winter L; Lawton MP; Ruckdeschel K
    Int J Aging Hum Dev; 2003; 56(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 14533855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Stability of elderly persons' expressed preferences regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments.
    Carmel S; Mutran EJ
    Soc Sci Med; 1999 Aug; 49(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 10414816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Factors influencing hospital patients' preferences in the utilization of life-sustaining treatments.
    Cohen-Mansfield J; Droge JA; Billig N
    Gerontologist; 1992 Feb; 32(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 1740261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Assessing the stability of values and health care preferences of older adults: A long-term comparison.
    Martin VC; Roberto KA
    J Gerontol Nurs; 2006 Nov; 32(11):23-31; quiz 32-3. PubMed ID: 17112135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Accuracy of health-related quality of life assessment: what is the benefit of incorporating patients' preferences for domain functioning?
    Gorbatenko-Roth KG; Levin IP; Altmaier EM; Doebbeling BN
    Health Psychol; 2001 Mar; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 11315731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Elderly outpatients' attitudes toward care in terminal stage disease].
    Matsushita S; Inamatsu T; Hashimoto H; Takahashi R; Takahashi T; Mori M; Kida K; Ozawa T
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi; 1999 Jan; 36(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10332194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis.
    Jung HP; Baerveldt C; Olesen F; Grol R; Wensing M
    Health Expect; 2003 Jun; 6(2):160-81. PubMed ID: 12752744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Barriers to completion of healthcare proxy forms: a qualitative analysis of ethnic differences.
    Morrison RS; Zayas LH; Mulvihill M; Baskin SA; Meier DE
    J Clin Ethics; 1998; 9(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 9750983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice.
    Ferrario A; Gloeckler S; Biller-Andorno N
    J Med Ethics; 2023 Mar; 49(3):165-174. PubMed ID: 36347603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence.
    Auriemma CL; Nguyen CA; Bronheim R; Kent S; Nadiger S; Pardo D; Halpern SD
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Jul; 174(7):1085-92. PubMed ID: 24861560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Randomized controlled trial of SPIRIT: an effective approach to preparing African-American dialysis patients and families for end of life.
    Song MK; Ward SE; Happ MB; Piraino B; Donovan HS; Shields AM; Connolly MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2009 Jun; 32(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 19205027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Turning failures into successes: a methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.
    Johansson M; Broström L
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18392948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.