173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11833680)
1. The deterioration of rotary nickel-titanium files under controlled conditions.
Svec TA; Powers JM
J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 11833680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method to assess rotary nickel-titanium files.
Svec TA; Powers JM
J Endod; 2000 Sep; 26(9):517-8. PubMed ID: 11199791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scanning electron microscope observations of new and used nickel-titanium rotary files.
Alapati SB; Brantley WA; Svec TA; Powers JM; Mitchell JC
J Endod; 2003 Oct; 29(10):667-9. PubMed ID: 14606793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Sattapan B; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 11199710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of microfractures, deformation and separation in EndoSequence and Profile nickel-titanium rotary files using an extracted molar tooth model.
Herold KS; Johnson BR; Wenckus CS
J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):712-4. PubMed ID: 17509412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
Pruett JP; Clement DJ; Carnes DL
J Endod; 1997 Feb; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 9220735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture.
Tepel J; Schäfer E; Hoppe W
J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9594751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
Bahia MG; Buono VT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary nickel-titanium instruments submitted to nitrogen ion implantation.
Gavini G; Pessoa OF; Barletta FB; Vasconcellos MA; Caldeira CL
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1183-6. PubMed ID: 20630295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model.
Yao JH; Schwartz SA; Beeson TJ
J Endod; 2006 Jan; 32(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 16410070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Arens FC; Hoen MM; Steiman HR; Dietz GC
J Endod; 2003 Oct; 29(10):664-6. PubMed ID: 14606792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use with low- and high-torque endodontic motors.
Gambarini G
J Endod; 2001 Dec; 27(12):772-4. PubMed ID: 11771588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files.
Kramkowski TR; Bahcall J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 19249605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
