These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11833680)

  • 21. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests.
    Kazemi RB; Stenman E; Spångberg LS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 11027388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of clinical use on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Ounsi HF; Salameh Z; Al-Shalan T; Ferrari M; Grandini S; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 17509417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use.
    Inan U; Gonulol N
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1396-9. PubMed ID: 19801238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip.
    Booth JR; Scheetz JP; Lemons JE; Eleazer PD
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12540222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Instrument deterioration with usage: nickel-titanium versus stainless steel.
    Zuolo ML; Walton RE
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jun; 28(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 9477904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cleaning efficiency of nickel-titanium GT and .04 rotary files when used in a torque-controlled rotary handpiece.
    Suffridge CB; Hartwell GR; Walker TL
    J Endod; 2003 May; 29(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 12775008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of torque and manual glide path on the defect or separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments in root canal therapy.
    Zarrabi MH; Javidi M; Vatanpour M; Esmaeili H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 20427918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use.
    Sattapan B; Nervo GJ; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 11199711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Torsional properties of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel endodontic files.
    Wolcott J; Himel VT
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 9594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of used and new RaCe instruments.
    Aydin C; Inan U; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e131-4. PubMed ID: 20219578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study.
    Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):756-63. PubMed ID: 14651285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study.
    Alomairy KH
    J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):559-62. PubMed ID: 19345805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of simulated clinical use on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Bahia MG; Melo MC; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 16632283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of K3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Ormiga Galvão Barbosa F; Antônio da Cunha Ponciano Gomes J; Pimenta de Araújo MC
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):982-5. PubMed ID: 17878088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Bateman G; Senger B; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 10530246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.