These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11833682)

  • 1. Comparison of two ultrasonic instruments for post removal.
    Dixon EB; Kaczkowski PJ; Nicholls JI; Harrington GW
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 11833682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on post removal in extracted human premolar teeth.
    Johnson WT; Leary JM; Boyer DB
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):487-8. PubMed ID: 9198432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instruments for intraradicular post removal.
    Buoncristiani J; Seto BG; Caputo AA
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):486-9. PubMed ID: 7714420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on the retention of adhesively luted intra-radicular posts.
    Satterthwaite JD; Stokes AN
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Sep; 12(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 15521391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of the effect of ultrasound on the removal of intracanal posts.
    Braga NM; Resende LM; Vasconcellos WA; Paulino SM; Sousa-Neto MD
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):492-5. PubMed ID: 19903640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal.
    Braga NM; Silva JM; Carvalho-Júnior JR; Ferreira RC; Saquy PC; Brito-Júnior M
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 22460315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts.
    Chandler NP; Qualtrough AJ; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 12946072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different ultrasonic vibration protocols and their effects on retention of post-and-core to root canal.
    Braga NM; Brito M; da Silva JM; Miranda LS; de Carvalho JR; Faria-e-Silva AL
    Gen Dent; 2013 Aug; 61(5):40-2. PubMed ID: 23928437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of dentinal crack incidence and of post removal time resulting from post removal by ultrasonic or mechanical force.
    Altshul JH; Marshall G; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):683-6. PubMed ID: 9587308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or zinc phosphate cements.
    Garrido AD; Fonseca TS; Alfredo E; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2004 Mar; 30(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15055437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of ultrasonic post instrumentation on root surface temperature.
    Huttula AS; Tordik PA; Imamura G; Eichmiller FC; McClanahan SB
    J Endod; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1085-7. PubMed ID: 17055912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of root external temperature during the application of ultrasound in removal of intraradicular posts.
    Garrido AD; Fonseca TS; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E; Sousa-Neto MD
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 17333983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the shape core on custom cast dowel and core removal by ultrasonic energy.
    Queiroz EC; Menezes MS; Biffi JC; Soares CJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 17518982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the effect of core diameter for removing radicular post with ultrasound.
    Alfredo E; Garrido AD; Souza-Filho CB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 15189318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts.
    Frazer RQ; Kovarik RE; Chance KB; Mitchell RJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 18686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of fiber posts cemented at different time intervals in canals obturated using an epoxy resin sealer.
    Vano M; Cury AH; Goracci C; Chieffi N; Gabriele M; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 18621457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.
    Butz F; Lennon AM; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the heat induced during ultrasonic post removal.
    Ettrich CA; Labossière PE; Pitts DL; Johnson JD
    J Endod; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1222-6. PubMed ID: 17889694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.