These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11836132)

  • 1. Methods for modeling and predicting mechanical deformations of the breast under external perturbations.
    Azar FS; Metaxas DN; Schnall MD
    Med Image Anal; 2002 Mar; 6(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11836132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A deformable finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations under external perturbations.
    Azar FS; Metaxas DN; Schnall MD
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Oct; 8(10):965-75. PubMed ID: 11699849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculation of dose distribution in compressible breast tissues using finite element modeling, Monte Carlo simulation and thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Mohammadyari P; Faghihi R; Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Lotfi M; Hematiyan MR; Koontz C; Meigooni AS
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9185-202. PubMed ID: 26572554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.
    Sturgeon GM; Kiarashi N; Lo JY; Samei E; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2207. PubMed ID: 27147333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A numerical investigation of breast compression: a computer-aided design approach for prescribing boundary conditions.
    Stewart ML; Smith LM; Hall N
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2876-84. PubMed ID: 21768039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of intraoperative brain shift by combination of stereovision and doppler ultrasound: phantom and animal model study.
    Mohammadi A; Ahmadian A; Azar AD; Sheykh AD; Amiri F; Alirezaie J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1753-64. PubMed ID: 25958061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
    Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-Based Deformable Registration of Preoperative 3D to Intraoperative Low-Resolution 3D and 2D Sequences of MR Images.
    Marami B; Sirouspour S; Capson DW
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 1):460-7. PubMed ID: 22003650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ghost imaging for targeting breast masses with MR imaging: a phantom study.
    Georgian-Smith D; Goldhaber DM; Haynor DR; Kaufman L
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jul; 7(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 10902956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling mammographic compression of the breast.
    Chung JH; Rajagopal V; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):758-65. PubMed ID: 18982673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-rigid registration of medical images based on estimation of deformation states.
    Marami B; Sirouspour S; Capson DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6891-921. PubMed ID: 25350234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience.
    Orel SG; Schnall MD; Newman RW; Powell CM; Torosian MH; Rosato EF
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 8090928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
    Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards a more realistic biomechanical modelling of breast malignant tumours.
    Wessel C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):631-48. PubMed ID: 22241544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-driven breast decompression and lesion mapping from digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Wels M; Kelm BM; Hammon M; Jerebko A; Sühling M; Comaniciu D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):438-46. PubMed ID: 23285581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
    Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR validation of soft tissue mimicing phantom deformation as modeled by nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Sciarretta J; Samani A; Bishop J; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 2002 Jan; 29(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11831575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Material properties estimation of layered soft tissue based on MR observation and iterative FE simulation.
    Tada M; Nagai N; Maeno T
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):633-40. PubMed ID: 16686013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting tumor location by modeling the deformation of the breast.
    Pathmanathan P; Gavaghan DJ; Whiteley JP; Chapman SJ; Brady JM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2471-80. PubMed ID: 18838373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactive MR-guided, 14-gauge core-needle biopsy of enhancing lesions in a breast phantom mode.
    Daniel BL; Birdwell RL; Black JW; Ikeda DM; Glover GH; Herfkens RJ
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Jul; 4(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 9232171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.