These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction using filtered spaced-word matches. Leimeister CA; Sohrabi-Jahromi S; Morgenstern B Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):971-979. PubMed ID: 28073754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Protein sequence comparison based on K-string dictionary. Yu C; He RL; Yau SS Gene; 2013 Oct; 529(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 23939466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. dCITE: Measuring Necessary Cladistic Information Can Help You Reduce Polytomy Artefacts in Trees. Wise MJ PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166991. PubMed ID: 27898695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies. Penner O; Grassberger P; Paczuski M PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e14373. PubMed ID: 21245917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Protein sequence comparison based on representation on a finite dimensional unit hypercube. Ghosh S; Pal J; Cattani C; Maji B; Bhattacharya DK J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2024 Aug; 42(12):6425-6439. PubMed ID: 37837426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. BPhyOG: an interactive server for genome-wide inference of bacterial phylogenies based on overlapping genes. Luo Y; Fu C; Zhang DY; Lin K BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():266. PubMed ID: 17650344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessing the performance of single-copy genes for recovering robust phylogenies. Aguileta G; Marthey S; Chiapello H; Lebrun MH; Rodolphe F; Fournier E; Gendrault-Jacquemard A; Giraud T Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):613-27. PubMed ID: 18709599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A phylogenetic analysis of the brassicales clade based on an alignment-free sequence comparison method. Hatje K; Kollmar M Front Plant Sci; 2012; 3():192. PubMed ID: 22952468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A novel method of characterizing genetic sequences: genome space with biological distance and applications. Deng M; Yu C; Liang Q; He RL; Yau SS PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17293. PubMed ID: 21399690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Rapid and accurate large-scale coestimation of sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees. Liu K; Raghavan S; Nelesen S; Linder CR; Warnow T Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5934):1561-4. PubMed ID: 19541996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Incongruence between gene trees and species trees and phylogenetic signal variation in plastid genes. Gonçalves DJP; Simpson BB; Ortiz EM; Shimizu GH; Jansen RK Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Sep; 138():219-232. PubMed ID: 31146023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An assembly and alignment-free method of phylogeny reconstruction from next-generation sequencing data. Fan H; Ives AR; Surget-Groba Y; Cannon CH BMC Genomics; 2015 Jul; 16(1):522. PubMed ID: 26169061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Walking tree heuristics for comparative genomic alignments. Cavener JD; Cull P; Holloway JL; Hsu TC Math Biosci; 2004; 188():207-19. PubMed ID: 14766103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Local reliability measures from sets of co-optimal multiple sequence alignments. Landan G; Graur D Pac Symp Biocomput; 2008; ():15-24. PubMed ID: 18229673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. G-Anchor: a novel approach for whole-genome comparative mapping utilizing evolutionary conserved DNA sequences. Lenis VPE; Swain M; Larkin DM Gigascience; 2018 May; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 29618053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]