BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11836696)

  • 1. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in conventional cervical/vaginal smears and thin-layer preparations.
    Hecht JL; Sheets EE; Lee KR
    Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11836696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histologic follow-up of atypical endocervical cells. Liquid-based, thin-layer preparation vs. conventional Pap smear.
    Wang N; Emancipator SN; Rose P; Rodriguez M; Abdul-Karim FW
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 12040636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
    Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cytologic predictive value for glandular involvement in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    MattoĊ›inho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Focchi J; Stavale JN; Nicolau SM; Rodrigues de Lima G; Baracat EC
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12685181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): Interobserver reproducibility in cervical smears and corresponding thin-layer preparations.
    Lee KR; Darragh TM; Joste NE; Krane JF; Sherman ME; Hurley LB; Allred EM; Manos MM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jan; 117(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 11789738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytologic and histologic correlation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Ha SY; Cho HI; Oh YH; Lee JM; Suh KS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2001 Apr; 16(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 11306750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on Pap smear and a clinically significant histologic diagnosis.
    Barreth D; Faught W; Schepansky A; Johnson G
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2004 Oct; 26(10):867-70. PubMed ID: 15507196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Incidence and Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on Cervical Pap Smears.
    Al-Rayyan E; Rashed M; Maaita M; Qudah S; Taso O; Haddadin W
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 May; 1(30):52-56. PubMed ID: 31242982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
    Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
    Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence and evaluation of an AGUS Papanicolaou smear in primary care.
    Valdini A; Vaccaro C; Pechinsky G; Abernathy V
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 2001; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 11355048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
    Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology.
    Schnatz PF; Guile M; O'Sullivan DM; Sorosky JI
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):701-8. PubMed ID: 16507944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: clinically significant lesions and means of patient follow-up.
    Soofer SB; Sidawy MK
    Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 10966560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
    Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.