188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11836703)
1. Diagnostic utility of the HepPar1 antibody to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration samples.
Siddiqui MT; Saboorian MH; Gokaslan ST; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 11836703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The utility of hepatocyte paraffin 1 antibody in the immunohistological distinction of hepatocellular carcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic carcinoma.
Shiran MS; Isa MR; Sherina MS; Rampal L; Hairuszah I; Sabariah AR
Malays J Pathol; 2006 Dec; 28(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 18376797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic value of arginase-1 immunostaining in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma as compared to HepPar-1.
Radwan NA; Ahmed NS
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Oct; 7():149. PubMed ID: 23111165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of HepPar1, pCEA, CD10, and CD34 expression in separating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Saad RS; Luckasevic TM; Noga CM; Johnson DR; Silverman JF; Liu YL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 14696137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential diagnosis of malignant epithelial tumours in the liver: an immunohistochemical study on liver biopsy material.
Al-Muhannadi N; Ansari N; Brahmi U; Satir AA
Ann Hepatol; 2011; 10(4):508-15. PubMed ID: 21911893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of antihepatocyte clone OCH1E5 (Hep Par 1) in histological evaluation of liver tumors.
Amarapurkar AD; Rege JD; Joshi AS; Vaiphei K; Amarapurkar DN
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 49(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 17001880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel diagnostic marker, p28GANK distinguishes hepatocellular carcinoma from potential mimics.
Fu X; Tan L; Liu S; Li H; Chen L; Qin J; Wu M; Wang H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2004 Sep; 130(9):514-20. PubMed ID: 15221469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HepPar1, MOC-31, pCEA, mCEA and CD10 for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma vs. metastatic adenocarcinoma in liver fine needle aspirates.
Wang L; Vuolo M; Suhrland MJ; Schlesinger K
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 16780018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liver Metastases of Neuroendocrine Tumors Rarely Show Overlapping Immunoprofile with Hepatocellular Carcinomas.
Jin M; Zhou X; Yearsley M; Frankel WL
Endocr Pathol; 2016 Sep; 27(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 27300354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immunocytochemical diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and identification of carcinomas of unknown primary metastatic to the liver on fine-needle aspiration cytologies.
Onofre AS; Pomjanski N; Buckstegge B; Böcking A
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 111(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 17567831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from adenocarcinoma by a simple panel: evaluation of the pitfalls.
Geramizadeh B; Boub R; Rahsaz M
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 50(3):507-10. PubMed ID: 17883119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hep Par 1 and selected antibodies in the immunohistological distinction of hepatocellular carcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma, combined tumours and metastatic carcinoma.
Leong AS; Sormunen RT; Tsui WM; Liew CT
Histopathology; 1998 Oct; 33(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 9822920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The utility of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry in the distinction of metastatic breast carcinoma from other tumors in the liver.
Nash JW; Morrison C; Frankel WL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Dec; 127(12):1591-5. PubMed ID: 14632573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The strength of cytomorphology and efficacy of immuno-cytochemistry in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from its mimics on fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Chikhale M; Toi PC; Siddaraju N; Ananthakrishnan R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 49(7):864-875. PubMed ID: 33929782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: an immunohistochemical and molecular study of eight cases.
Terracciano LM; Glatz K; Mhawech P; Vasei M; Lehmann FS; Vecchione R; Tornillo L
Am J Surg Pathol; 2003 Oct; 27(10):1302-12. PubMed ID: 14508391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can CD34 discriminate between benign and malignant hepatocytic lesions in fine-needle aspirates and thin core biopsies?
de Boer WB; Segal A; Frost FA; Sterrett GF
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 90(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 11038423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in hepatocellular carcinoma, its variants and their mimics.
Wee A
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2006 Sep; 14(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 16932016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic utility of CD10 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the liver.
Lin F; Abdallah H; Meschter S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 14755758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunohistochemical Study of Glypican-3 and HepPar-1 in Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Metastatic Carcinomas in FNA of the Liver.
Ibrahim TR; Abdel-Raouf SM
Pathol Oncol Res; 2015 Apr; 21(2):379-87. PubMed ID: 25108409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arginase-1 is More Specific Than Hepatocyte Paraffin 1 for Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinomas With Cytoplasmic Clearing from Nonhepatocellular Clear Cell Tumors in Liver Biopsies.
Larson BK; Dhall D; Guindi M
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2024 Jan; 32(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 37859468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
