These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11837089)
1. [Masticatory performance with mandibular implant-retained overdentures]. Slagter AP; Geertman ME; Fontijn-Tekamp FA; Witter DJ; van Waas MA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Nov; 102(11):449-52. PubMed ID: 11837089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comminution of food with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. Geertman ME; Slagter AP; van Waas MA; Kalk W J Dent Res; 1994 Dec; 73(12):1858-64. PubMed ID: 7814759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Swallowing thresholds of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with variable portion sizes. Fontijn-Tekamp FA; Slagter AP; Van der Bilt A; Van't Hof MA; Kalk W; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 15142103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types. van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masticatory performance and chewing experience with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Geertman ME; Slagter AP; van 't Hof MA; van Waas MA; Kalk W J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10080319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of mandibular ridge height on masticatory performance with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures. Kimoto K; Garrett NR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 12939003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers. Roumanas ED; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Kapur KK Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 14714839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare. Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency. Farias Neto A; Pereira BM; Xitara RL; Germano AR; Ribeiro JA; Mestriner Junior W; Carreiro Ada F Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e650-5. PubMed ID: 21916952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Thomason JM; Lund JP; Chehade A; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 14651229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does a prosthodontist spend more time providing mandibular two-implant overdentures than conventional dentures? Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Chehade A; Klemetti E; Savard A; Lund JP; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 12170856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life. Assunção WG; Zardo GG; Delben JA; Barão VA Gerodontology; 2007 Dec; 24(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 17999736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Masticatory performance and mandibular movement patterns of patients with natural dentitions, complete dentures, and implant-supported overdentures. Toman M; Toksavul S; Saracoglu A; Cura C; Hatipoglu A Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 22371833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]