These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11837109)

  • 21. Computerized tomography for implant treatment planning.
    Amet EM
    J Kans Dent Assoc; 1998; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 9800552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of the edentulous individual: an investigation into the accuracy of radiographic identifications.
    Richmond R; Pretty IA
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):984-7. PubMed ID: 20412366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
    Peltola JS; Mattila M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width.
    Dantas JA; Montebello Filho A; Campos PS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15709099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
    Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
    J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible.
    Lindh C; Petersson A; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 8884836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Significance of radiographs in the planning of implantations].
    Brandt HH
    Orale Implantol; 1979 Jul; 6(6):7-14. PubMed ID: 297232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissue changes.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Jun; 5(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 7918909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of intraoral radiographs for identification of edentulous patients rehabilitated with implants.
    Ahlqvist J
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2016 Jul; 34(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27350697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiographic evaluation of alveolar crest obscured by dental implants.
    Ludlow JB; Nason RH; Hutchens LH; Moriarty J
    Implant Dent; 1995; 4(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 7550080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients.
    Kullman L; Al-Asfour A; Zetterqvist L; Andersson L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 17340902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiographic assessment of the marginal bone level after implant treatment: a comparison of periapical and Scanora detailed narrow beam radiography.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Lindh C; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 12775663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validating an uncoupled laser-aiming device for serial implant radiography.
    Thistle GS; Russell KA; Chaytor DV; Russell LT
    J Oral Implantol; 1997; 23(1-2):12-20. PubMed ID: 9477857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study.
    Andriessen FS; Rijkens DR; van der Meer WJ; Wismeijer DW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 24210732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.