These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11837143)

  • 1. Pegram's regress: a missed chance for sensible judicial review of managed care decisions.
    Cahill MT; Jacobson PD
    Am J Law Med; 2001; 27(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 11837143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Employer sponsored health benefit plans under ERISA after Pegram v. Herdrich: the fiduciary duty argument and mixed eligibility versus treatment decisions.
    Karns JE
    J Law Health; 2000-2001; 15(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11930500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pegram's significance for managed health care.
    Saccoccio L
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():195-201. PubMed ID: 12669329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
    Mariner WK
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liability of managed care organizations expands.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 10725048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sacrificing patients for profits: physician incentives to limit care and ERISA fiduciary duty.
    Marsh AK
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1999; 77(4):1323-42. PubMed ID: 16273698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pegram v. Herdrich. 530 U.S. 211 (2000).
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():159-60. PubMed ID: 12669324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mismanaged care: the challenges facing judicial interpretation of contemporary health policy.
    Schlesinger M
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():203-13. PubMed ID: 12669330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pegram v. Herdrich: The Supreme Court confronts managed care.
    Jost TS
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():187-93. PubMed ID: 12669328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Litigating around ERISA to quality managed healthcare: an HMO can breach fiduciary duties.
    Karns JE
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2001 Mar; (263):9-30. PubMed ID: 11291401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A perspective from within the white coat.
    Chow RD
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():171-5. PubMed ID: 12669326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dividing loyalties: caring for individuals and populations.
    Jecker NS
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():177-86. PubMed ID: 12669327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERISA update. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Dec; 129(12):1754-5. PubMed ID: 9854928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical responsibility and legal liability in managed care.
    Moskowitz EH
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Mar; 46(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 9514390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supreme Court refuses to "precipitate the upheaval" in Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Torrance AB
    Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Jul; ():16-8. PubMed ID: 11066640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal challenges to managed care: another view.
    Hall MA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(6):246-8. PubMed ID: 10650708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pegram v. Herdrich: a victory for HMOs or the beginning of the end for ERISA preemption?
    Borzi PC
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():161-9. PubMed ID: 12669325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Managed care's responsibility for decisions to deny benefits: the ERISA obstacle. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Apr; 49(4):461-2, 472. PubMed ID: 9550234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERISA and medical professional liability.
    Griffen FD; Adelman SH
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jul; 83(7):16-21. PubMed ID: 10345205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.