These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11837143)
41. Cracks in the wall. Court decisions penetrate ERISA's invulnerability. Borges W Tex Med; 2003 Mar; 99(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 12674976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Malpractice. Chinks in ERISA's armor. Huff C Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Nov; 71(22):39-40. PubMed ID: 9386365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Trends in managed care contracting. Gallagher J Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(3):11-6. PubMed ID: 10110708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. To sue or not to sue? Spragins EE Newsweek; 1996 Dec; 128(24):50. PubMed ID: 10162567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Slouching toward managed care liability: reflections on doctrinal boundaries, paradigm shifts, and incremental reform. Mariner WK J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(3-4):253-77. PubMed ID: 12056367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability. Mariner WK N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Managed care liability. Benjamin GC Physician Exec; 1999; 25(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 10351737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Will ERISA be the death knell for managed care? Meadors GM J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 15(5):264-6. PubMed ID: 10915519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Managed care liability and ERISA preemption. Rakich JS; Ledbetter RK Manag Care Q; 2000; 8(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 11009731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Managed care and the judicial system: another avenue for reform? Lens V Health Soc Work; 2002 Feb; 27(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 11926214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Law & Psychiatry: Overcoming ERISA as a barrier to managed care organizations' liability for utilization review decisions. Petrila J Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Jul; 54(7):945-6. PubMed ID: 12851428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. ERISA preemption and regulation of managed health care: the case for managed federalism. Farrell MG Am J Law Med; 1997; 23(2-3):251-89. PubMed ID: 9262757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Pegram v. Herdrich: On peritonitis, preemption, and the elusive goal of managed care accountability. Hammer PJ J Health Polit Policy Law; 2001 Aug; 26(4):767-87. PubMed ID: 11523963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The two faces of gag provisions: patients and physicians in a bind. Brand GS; Munoz GM; Nichols MG; Okata MU; Pitt JB; Seager S Yale Law Policy Rev; 1998; 17():249-80. PubMed ID: 16437824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The United State Supreme Court and health law: the year in review. The Supreme Court federalizes managed care liability. Ruger TW J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15490600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Applying fiduciary responsibilities in the managed care context. Jacobson PD; Cahill MT Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(2-3):155-73. PubMed ID: 10953769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Medicine meets resource limits: restructuring the legal standard of care. Morreim EH Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1997; 59(1):1-95. PubMed ID: 14631988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The final chapter (maybe) of preemption of HMO accountability under state law. Jordan K Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Feb; ():15-27. PubMed ID: 14989070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The perils of patients' rights. Rovner J Bus Health; 1999 Nov; 17(11):18. PubMed ID: 10662368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The emerging convergence of the doctrine of informed consent and judicial reinterpretation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Blackmon W J Leg Med; 1998 Sep; 19(3):377-95. PubMed ID: 9775579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]