BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11837585)

  • 1. Evaluation of compressed lung CT image quality using quantitative analysis.
    Yamamoto S; Johkoh T; Mihara N; Umeda T; Azuma M; Nakanishi S; Narumi Y; Naito H; Nakamura H
    Radiat Med; 2001; 19(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 11837585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel MOS prediction models for compressed medical image quality.
    Kumar B; Singh SP; Mohan A; Anand A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2011; 35(3-4):161-71. PubMed ID: 21401314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of compressed medical images.
    Shiao YH; Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Lin CH; Chuang CC
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 17318703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The compression of numerical radiological images].
    Trippi D; Russo G; Talone P; Caramella D
    Radiol Med; 1994 Nov; 88(5):631-42. PubMed ID: 7824780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods and limits of digital image compression of retinal images for telemedicine.
    Eikelboom RH; Yogesan K; Barry CJ; Constable IJ; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L; House PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1916-24. PubMed ID: 10845617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images.
    Woo HS; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Hahn S; Kim B; Kim YH; Lee KH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 17715097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
    Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of irreversible compressed images in computed radiography using physical image quality measures].
    Watanabe H; Tsai DY; Lee Y; Nakamura T; Miyazaki M; Kuramochi Y; Kojima K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Dec; 65(12):1618-27. PubMed ID: 20124739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of a 2D two-point maximum entropy regularization method for signal-to-noise ratio enhancement: application to CT polymer gel dosimetry.
    Jirasek A; Matthews Q; Hilts M; Schulze G; Blades MW; Turner RF
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2599-617. PubMed ID: 16675872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images.
    Lee MS; Shin DS; Berger JW
    Retina; 2000; 20(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 10872933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors.
    Lasio GM; Whiting BR; Williamson JF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2247-66. PubMed ID: 17404467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images.
    Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Kim B; Seo J; Mantiuk R
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3218-26. PubMed ID: 19673221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images.
    Oh J; Woolley SI; Arvanitis TN; Townend JN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1352-61. PubMed ID: 11811835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement.
    Ko JP; Chang J; Bomsztyk E; Babb JS; Naidich DP; Rusinek H
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 16126923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images.
    Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct digital lateral cephalometry: the effects of JPEG compression on image quality.
    Wenger NA; Tewson DH; McDonald F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 16290207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.