These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11837822)

  • 1. Strain distribution in the proximal human femur.
    Leali A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Jan; 84(1):148. PubMed ID: 11837822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of a physiological hip prosthesis: evaluation of the strains after implantation of a prototype of hip implant: experiment in a dry femur.
    Vander Sloten J; Labey L; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8490530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro study of the strain distribution in human femora with anatomical and customised femoral stems.
    Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):676-82. PubMed ID: 19407307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur.
    Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The stress in femoral prosthesis: a study of the importance of the diaphyseal support and horizontal setting (author's transl)].
    Lord G; Marotte JH; Blanchard JP; Guillamon JL; Bancel P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1980; 66(3):141-56. PubMed ID: 6450977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in-vitro investigation of the CPS-Plus femoral stem: influence of the proximal centraliser on cement pressurisation during stem insertion.
    Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Apr; 74(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12807321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Otto Aufranc Award Paper. An analysis of femoral prosthesis design: the effects on proximal femur loading.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Pedersen DR
    Hip; 1981; ():111-22. PubMed ID: 7333883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Extensometry and primary anchorage of femur implants. Study of the upper metaphyseal intracortical support of the B.P.R cement-less implant].
    Delecrin J; Passuti N; Royer J; Rogez JM; Bainvel JV
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1989; 55(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 2801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical simulator for the upper femur.
    Munting E; Verhelpen M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 8372646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The anatomic basis of femoral component design.
    Noble PC; Alexander JW; Lindahl LJ; Yew DT; Granberry WM; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):148-65. PubMed ID: 3416522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Circumferential and axial strain in the proximal femur: effect of prosthesis type and position.
    McBeath AA; Schopler SA; Narechania RG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (150):301-5. PubMed ID: 7428236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Photoelastic stress analysis of human femurs before and after implantation of different models of femur neck prostheses].
    Wieners G; Pech M; Streitparth F; Jansson V; Plitz W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2007; 145(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 17345548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of axial and torsional loading on strain distribution in the proximal femur as related to cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jul; (292):376-83. PubMed ID: 8519135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letter of apology: Risk factors affecting the outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip.
    Beaulé PE; Amstutz HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jun; (435):278. PubMed ID: 15930954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.