114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11838288)
1. An ecological risk assessment for spinosad use on cotton.
Cleveland CB; Mayes MA; Cryer SA
Pest Manag Sci; 2002 Jan; 58(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 11838288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spinosad toxicity to pollinators and associated risk.
Mayes MA; Thompson GD; Husband B; Miles MM
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2003; 179():37-71. PubMed ID: 15366583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of spinosad, a naturally derived insect control agent, to the honeybee (Apis melifera).
Miles M; Mayes M; Dutton R
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2002; 67(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 12696428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endosulfan and its metabolite, endosulfan sulfate, in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida: a probabilistic aquatic ecological risk assessment.
Rand GM; Carriger JF; Gardinali PR; Castro J
Ecotoxicology; 2010 Jun; 19(5):879-900. PubMed ID: 20204505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the chronic Tier-1 effect assessment approach for insecticides protective for aquatic ecosystems?
Brock TC; Bhatta R; van Wijngaarden RP; Rico A
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Oct; 12(4):747-58. PubMed ID: 26442690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lethal and sublethal side-effect assessment supports a more benign profile of spinetoram compared with spinosad in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris.
Besard L; Mommaerts V; Abdu-Alla G; Smagghe G
Pest Manag Sci; 2011 May; 67(5):541-7. PubMed ID: 21472971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: V. Combining landscape-level exposures and ecotoxicological effects data to characterize risks.
Maund SJ; Travis KZ; Hendley P; Giddings JM; Solomon KR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Mar; 20(3):687-92. PubMed ID: 11349872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fipronil: environmental fate, ecotoxicology, and human health concerns.
Tingle CC; Rother JA; Dewhurst CF; Lauer S; King WJ
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2003; 176():1-66. PubMed ID: 12442503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dietary risk assessment of spinosad in China.
Gao R; Dong J; Zhang W; Chen WL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 49(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17628261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ecological risk assessment for insecticides used in adult mosquito management.
Davis RS; Peterson RK; Macedo PA
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jul; 3(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 17695110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toxic effect and biochemical study of chlorfluazuron, oxymatrine, and spinosad on honey bees (Apis mellifera).
Rabea EI; Nasr HM; Badawy ME
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 58(3):722-32. PubMed ID: 19812878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of spinosad on bumble bees (Bombus impatiens Cresson).
Morandin LA; Winston ML; Franklin MT; Abbott VA
Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Jul; 61(7):619-26. PubMed ID: 15880684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of population models to reduce uncertainty and increase value relevance in ecological risk assessments of pesticides: an example based on acute mortality data for daphnids.
Hanson N; Stark JD
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 21853521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Acute lethal effect of the commercial formulation of the insecticides Imidacloprid, Spinosad y Thiocyclam hidrogenoxalate in Bombus atratus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) workers].
Riaño Jiménez D; Cure JR
Rev Biol Trop; 2016 Dec; 64(4):1737-45. PubMed ID: 29465949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing ecological risks of pesticides: the utility of a Risk Quotient ranking approach across refinements of exposure.
Peterson RK
Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Jan; 62(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 16217731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of contact toxicity and wheat condition to mortality of stored-product insects exposed to spinosad.
Toews MD; Subramanyam B
Pest Manag Sci; 2003 May; 59(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 12741521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Refined aquatic risk assessment for aldicarb in the United States.
Moore DR; Thompson RP; Rodney SI; Fischer D; Ramanarayanan T; Hall T
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):102-18. PubMed ID: 20821677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Properties, toxicity and current applications of the biolarvicide spinosad.
Santos VSV; Pereira BB
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2020; 23(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 31709913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of spinosad against the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, and its impact on associated biological control agents on greenhouse cucumbers in southern Ontario.
Jones T; Scott-Dupree C; Harris R; Shipp L; Harris B
Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Feb; 61(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 15619719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of toxicity and environmental safety in use of spinosad to rationalize control strategies against Aedes aegypti.
Santos VSV; Silva CE; Oliveira CM; de Morais CR; Limongi JE; Pereira BB
Chemosphere; 2019 Jul; 226():166-172. PubMed ID: 30927668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
