197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11838307)
41. Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Takac I; Gorisek B
Tumori; 1999; 85(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 10587025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Wang XI; Huang F; Zhang S
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2017 Nov; 47(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 29263039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A randomized trial of the Fischer cone biopsy excisor and loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Boardman LA; Steinhoff MM; Shackelton R; Weitzen S; Crowthers L
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 104(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 15458896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Outcome after treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: relation between colposcopically directed biopsy, conization and cervical loop excision.
Murta EF; Conti R; Rodovalho J; Barcelos AC; Adad SJ; de Souza H
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):587-90. PubMed ID: 15493171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Noothong S; Inthasorn P; Warnnissorn M
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 56(5):628-631. PubMed ID: 29037548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics].
Brun JL; Youbi A; Hocké C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12407327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Double-LEEP Cone Procedure as an Alternative to Cold-Knife Conization in Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Husseinzadeh N; Retting WL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 25950891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Clinical significance of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma].
Song Y; Wang Q; Sui L; Gao SJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 29609232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of Two Step LEEP and Cold Conisation For Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions to Decrease Positive Surgical Margins.
Senol T; Polat M; Ozkaya E; Karateke A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3317-20. PubMed ID: 27509969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. LEEP: early experience with a new approach to cervical lesions.
Gundersen JH; Nichols S
Wis Med J; 1994 Feb; 93(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 8191780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Four categories of LEEP for CIN of various areas: a retrospective cohort study.
Yin G; Li J; Wu A; Liang J; Yuan Z
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Apr; 26(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 27652670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Preoperative predictors of positive margins after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure-Cone.
Tillmanns TD; Falkner CA; Engle DB; Wan JY; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin DS; Zuna R; Gold MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Feb; 100(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 16321430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
Simões RB; Campaner AB
APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Knife conization versus loop excision--clinical and histomorphologic results].
Girardi F; Heydarfadai M; Koroschetz F; Pickel H; Winter R
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 7987084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review.
Hurtado-Roca Y; Becerra-Chauca N; Malca M
Rev Saude Publica; 2020; 54():27. PubMed ID: 32187314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Loop conization for the treatment of microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Tseng CJ; Chang CC; Tseng CC; Hou HC; Wang CB; Chen CH; Soong YK; Pao CC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(4):1574-8. PubMed ID: 16884368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
